UPDATE 1-Dow Jones panel concerned about hacking scandal

Sun Jul 17, 2011 3:51pm EDT

* Dow Jones panel criticizes embroiled News Corp units

* Says no offenses have taken place at Dow Jones-panel

* Has not investigated practices thoroughly-report (Adds quotes, background, links)

NEW YORK, July 17 (Reuters) - A special committee formed to oversee the integrity of Dow Jones & Co under parent News Corp (NWSA.O) is very concerned about the British phone hacking scandal that has shaken Rupert Murdoch's media empire. [ID:nN1E76C1GN]

The Dow Jones Special Committee said it was monitoring the situation and had been in talks with Dow Jones officials over the scandal, which has led to several arrests in London, as well as the resignation of Dow Jones head Les Hinton.

Hinton had run News Corp's British newspaper arm, News International, for many years including the period of the alleged phone hacking.

"Such matters are deeply concerning to us, suggesting as they do a serious default of basic journalistic standards in certain units of News Corp," the Dow Jones Special Committee said in a statement on Friday after Hinton's resignation.

The five-member watchdog was created in 2007 to help assuage the concerns of the Bancroft family who used to own Dow Jones. The Bancrofts were worried about the editorial independence and integrity of the Wall Street Journal and Dow Jones Newswires under News Corp ownership.

Each member of the committee, chaired by Thomas Bray, is paid $100,000 a year. (Click here for a Breakingviews column on the panel [ID: nN1E76D16V])

The panel said it has no reason to believe that Hinton's departure was related to activities by the Wall Street Journal or Dow Jones "or that any of the London offenses or anything like them have taken place at Dow Jones."

Bray told the Associated Press on Saturday that the committee did not conduct an independent investigation to come to its conclusions.

"All we can testify to is what has or has not come to our attention," Bray told the AP. "That's our function. We're not a police force."

When asked if the committee plans to open an investigation into the matter, Bray told Reuters, "We are letting the statement speak for itself for now."

Rebekah Brooks, the former head of Rupert Murdoch's British newspaper business, was arrested on Sunday in the latest twist of a phone-hacking scandal that has tainted British police and politicians and shaken the tycoon's global media empire. [ID:nL6E7IH031] (Reporting by Liana B. Baker and Jennifer Saba; Editing by Richard Chang)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
morristhewise wrote:
There was once a time when only the Mafia was wiretapped or had their voice box hacked, it has now trickled down to the ordinary person suspected of disloyalty or cheating on their taxes. China has 350 thousand employees that sniff the phone lines for sounds of dissent, they are paid only by each bad word recorded.

Jul 17, 2011 4:27pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
kokonuts2 wrote:
Ah, the non-denial denials begin! A sure sign of guilty verdicts yet to come. Still, bit early to enter a plea. Let the FBI charge you first, guys. Then you can start spinning . . . in the wind.

And meanwhile, FoxAgitProp and the Foxified WSJ keep churning out the lies, and trashing the US economy in preparation for their next big election-manipulation. It’s the best legal strategy, really: Get some homophobic holy-rolling gun-nutty racist corporate sock-puppet into the White House, and all of Uncle Rupee’s problems will disappear. Except the moral & ethical ones.

Jul 17, 2011 5:39pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
nick11 wrote:
so, this ‘watchdog’ is set up by the paper that is owned by murdoch … sure, real objective – who pays the lapdog, excuse me, ‘watchdog’ committee? they’ve already proven their particular brand of oversight doesn’t mean much – ask the dowlers …

Jul 17, 2011 6:45pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.