Egan Jones cuts US rating, cites high debt load

NEW YORK, July 18 Mon Jul 18, 2011 1:04pm EDT

Related Topics

NEW YORK, July 18 (Reuters) - Credit rating agency Egan-Jones has cut the United States' top credit ranking, citing concerns over the country's high debt load and the difficulty the government faces in significantly reducing spending.

The agency said the action, which cut U.S. sovereign debt to the second-highest rating, was not based on fears over the country not raising its debt ceiling.

Instead, the cut is due the U.S. debt load standing at more than 100 percent of its gross domestic product. This compares with Canada, for example, which has a debt-to-GDP ratio of 35 percent, Egan-Jones said in a report sent on Saturday.

Lawmakers in Washington are seeking to agree on spending cuts before raising the country's debt ceiling, with five days remaining before President Obama's deadline for a deal.

Both Moody's Investors Service and Standard & Poor's, the two largest rating agencies, said last week they may cut the U.S. top rating if a deal to raise the debt ceiling is not reached.

Fitch Ratings on Monday also reiterated that it will place its U.S. rating on review for downgrade if the debt ceiling is not raised by Aug. 2. (Reporting by Karen Brettell; Editing by Dan Grebler)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (2)
SukieTawdry wrote:
Well, Moody’s et al, if we raise the debt limit, the debt-to-GDP ratio only gets worse, right? Do what you have to do.

Jul 21, 2011 2:24pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
ojfl wrote:
Reuters just reported separately that S&P said it is not enough simply to raise the debt ceiling:

Time to pull out the scissors Washington…

Jul 21, 2011 5:11pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.