Recommended Newsletters

Reuters U.S. Top News
A quick-fix on the day's news published with Reuters videos and award-winning news photography and delivered at your choice of one of four times during the day.
Reuters Deals Today
The latest Reuters articles on M&A, IPOs, private equity, hedge funds and regulatory updates delivered to your inbox each day.
Reuters Technology Report
Your daily briefing on the latest tech developments from around the world from Reuters expert tech correspondents.

Debt stalemate invokes language of Armageddon

Related Topics

President Barack Obama departs a news conference on debt negotiations with the U.S. Congress in the briefing room of the White House in Washington, July 11, 2011. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

President Barack Obama departs a news conference on debt negotiations with the U.S. Congress in the briefing room of the White House in Washington, July 11, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Kevin Lamarque

WASHINGTON | Mon Jul 18, 2011 8:32am EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - With time quickly running out to raise the debt ceiling, the Obama administration is turning to biblical rhetoric to underscore the disastrous consequences if the United States defaults.

For weeks Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and other administration officials have been warning of an economic "catastrophe" if the $14.3 trillion debt ceiling, which caps the amount Washington can borrow, is not raised by August 2.

Merriam-Webster dictionary defines catastrophe as "a momentous tragic event ranging from extreme misfortune to utter overthrow or ruin."

That definition appears to chime with the view of most economists, who agree that a U.S. default on its obligations would plunge the United States into a new recession and send shockwaves through international financial markets.

In interviews, speeches and news conferences, administration officials have used the word again and again. But instead of scaring Republicans into action and breaking deadlocked debt talks it has had the opposite effect.

Republican lawmakers accuse the Obama administration of scaremongering and many refuse to budge from their firm belief that a default will not happen, that the United States can keep paying its creditors simply by cutting back on spending.

Americans also do not appear to share the Obama administration's sense of doom. Polls show a majority of Americans are happy for the debt ceiling not to be raised, although its not clear that those being surveyed are fully aware of the consequences of such a step.

WHEN CATASTROPHE IS NOT ENOUGH

So, the White House has upped the ante, eschewing catastrophe for a word more reminiscent of the "Cold War" stand-off between a nuclear-armed Soviet Union and United States -- Armageddon.

Obama used the biblical reference last week at a White House news conference when he talked about a complicated Republican plan that seeks to pin the blame for raising the debt ceiling on him. He said then it could avert economic Armageddon.

Obama's budget director, Jack Lew, repeated it during a television interview on Sunday.

"Notwithstanding the voices of a few who are willing play with Armageddon, responsible leaders in Washington are not, he told ABC's "This Week" program.

To be fair, it was a Republican, Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison, who first warned way back in April the debt ceiling negotiations would be a cataclysmic event, although at the time her warning was dismissed by many in Washington as hyperbole.

"The debt ceiling is going to be Armageddon," she said, trying to explain that while a just-ended budget dispute between Republicans and Obama had brought the government to the brink of a shutdown, the debt talks would be even worse.

Merriam-Webster's definition makes clear that while a catastrophe would be bad enough, Armageddon would be positively apocalyptic: "The site or time of a final and conclusive battle between the forces of good and evil; a usually vast decisive conflict or confrontation."

(Editing by Todd Eastham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (23)
Tommyuk wrote:
The ordinary US Citizens have and are still paying the price for the financial meltdown 2 years ago. The people who caused it are away and free, so why would the ordinary US Citizen worry if there is another meltdown? Those who lost their homes and/or their jobs have not much else to lose so why would they be perturbed if the US defaults? Perhaps this time (if it happens) those who caused it or profited from it will now pay an exacting price. Lets hope so.

Jul 18, 2011 7:48am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Tommyuk wrote:
The ordinary US Citizens have and are still paying the price for the financial meltdown 2 years ago. The people who caused it are away and free, so why would the ordinary US Citizen worry if there is another meltdown? Those who lost their homes and/or their jobs have not much else to lose so why would they be perturbed if the US defaults? Perhaps this time (if it happens) those who caused it or profited from it will now pay an exacting price. Lets hope so.

Jul 18, 2011 7:48am EDT  --  Report as abuse
ljshelley wrote:
Let’s pray it comes smashing to the gorund so the entire planet can be free from this virus called “ECONOMY”!

There is nothing to fear.

Jul 18, 2011 8:21am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.