Pediatrician feels heat over child obesity idea

BOSTON Mon Jul 18, 2011 12:02pm EDT

Related Topics

Photo

Ebola epidemic

Quarantines and isolation units imposed to stop the spread of the worst Ebola outbreak in history.  Slideshow 

BOSTON (Reuters) - Boston pediatrician David Ludwig, the center of a media firestorm this week, wants to set the record straight on his view that a state should intervene in the most extreme cases of child obesity.

Ludwig and co-author Lindsey Murtagh at the Harvard School of Public Health triggered a backlash with an opinion piece in a leading U.S. medical journal about what could be done about highly overweight youngsters.

They argued that when all other efforts failed, a state should consider putting high-risk obese kids in foster care, and said doing so may be the more ethical choice that could avert drastic measures like weight-loss surgery.

Ludwig, of Boston's Children's Hospital, has since responded to dozens of e-mails this week from angry and terrified parents. Other medical experts have questioned the rationale of removing a child from an otherwise functional and supportive family if they are obese.

In his first interview since the backlash began, Ludwig said the article was meant to promote a dialogue on childhood obesity, which has become a life-threatening problem for many youngsters.

"It's absolutely understandable that if someone with an obese child heard the government could swoop in and take that child away, (they would) be frightened and outraged," Ludwig told Reuters. "I want to emphasize that foster care should only be the last resort when all other options have failed."

In his replies to parents, Ludwig has provided copies of his opinion piece, published this week in the Journal of the American Medical Association, that says there is a role for the state when it comes to helping obese children, but removing them from a home is very rarely the solution.

"It's just been heartbreaking to see how the story has been wildly exaggerated by some of the media, causing a great deal of pain and suffering for people," Ludwig said.

With at least 20 million overweight and obese children in the United States and some 2 million of those kids at the very highest risk, childhood obesity may be the "most important threat that exists to this generation of children," he said.

But placing a youngster in foster care "should absolutely not be an option" for most of the highest risk cases.

And that is what Ludwig and Murtagh wrote in the piece, he said. To prove his point and calm the fury that has erupted, JAMA is making the full text of the piece available free to the public for a week at: here

Ludwig explained that state intervention could include financial support to families, social services, access to safe recreation areas and even parenting courses to help manage a child's uncontrolled eating habits.

In 99 percent of the most serious cases, removing a child from a home is not an option. Ludwig said that in over 15 years of treating some 10,000 patients battling obesity he only knows of one case where the child was taken from parents.

"The ultimate answer to the obesity epidemic is not to blame parents, it's to create a more healthful and supportive society," Ludwig said.

"But until we get there, what do we do about that 14-year-old, 400-pound (182 kg) child who's not facing increased risk of illness 20 years from now, but who's facing life-threatening complications today?" he said.

(Reporting by Lauren Keiper; Editing by Michele Gershberg and Ros Krasny)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
its child abuse.

Jul 18, 2011 1:38pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Poalima wrote:
We see nothing wrong with removing them from homes, and declaring the parents “unfit” for drug addiction. How is such extreme feeding any different?

Jul 19, 2011 8:36pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
alconnelly wrote:
If a parent under feeds a child it is child abuse. But when a child becomes obese we blame the fast food vendors and the food companies. In both cases the children are malnourished. So what’s the difference. In most cases of obese children are the result of poverty, ignorance and neglect. A program of parent education on foods and cooking and child rearing are needed. If the children continue to be obese the children need to be removed from the home. The parents should continue to be responsible for financial support.

Jul 20, 2011 1:13am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.