U.S. cyber arrests seen leading to more hackers

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Thu Jul 21, 2011 7:29pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The FBI's arrest this week of 16 people who allegedly participated in high-profile cyber attacks is providing a treasure trove of information and will lead to further arrests, a U.S. law enforcement official told Reuters on Thursday.

The crackdown -- on members of the group Anonymous -- was the biggest reaction so far by U.S. authorities to a string of cyber attacks, and was meant to serve as a deterrent to others who may be considering joining the cause.

The arrests spanned nine states and the District of Columbia. FBI agents also executed more than 35 search warrants, seizing computers and other records. Those arrested could try to strike plea agreements offering to provide information to win more lenient treatment.

Some private cybersecurity specialists have questioned whether the raids will have much lasting impact.

But the law enforcement official said, "This is the good example of a significant event that successfully removed a number of individuals from being part of the problem and will certainly lead to information that will result in locating other subjects." The official declined to be further identified while speaking about an ongoing law enforcement investigation.

Members of Anonymous mounted attacks last year against eBay's PayPal as well as Visa and Mastercard after the companies severed their relationships with the WikiLeaks organization. The attacks included flooding the sites with data trying to render them inoperable.

The arrests included members of Anonymous at various levels of the loose-knit organization, the official said. The official declined to comment on whether they knew each other.

While attacks by Anonymous and related "hacktivist" groups have drawn wide attention, other cyber crimes aimed at espionage are a higher priority for the FBI. The latter have included intrusions at Google, Lockheed Martin and the International Monetary Fund.

"We didn't pull resources away from those higher priority cases to work this," the official said.

It remains an open question whether the arrests will have the desired deterrent effect. Anonymous and another hacking group, Lulz Security, issued a statement on Thursday saying they would continue their efforts.

"I think they (the FBI) are trying to send a signal that this isn't cost-free in the hopes that it will scare off some of the others. If we're lucky it will work," said James Lewis, a cybersecurity expert with the Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank.

The law enforcement official said that people allegedly involved in the cyber attacks probably did not realize the risks of prison time and that prosecutors would likely seek stiff sentences. Those arrested, if convicted, could face up to 10 years in prison for trying to damage a protected computer.

"They're probably not the types of people who have been prepared for any time in jail. This is not a joke," the official said. "The reality of the fact that this is both a crime and that people will be actually doing time in jail I think really hasn't sunk in to a lot of people who are getting involved in these activities."

Lewis said one possible benefit from the cyber attacks is that it will lead network and website administrators to beef up their security.

"These guys exploit poor configuration, and that's the simplest thing to fix but there's just so much of it out there it will take a while," Lewis said.

(Editing by Warren Strobel and Mohammad Zargham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
jpenley wrote:
It was reported widely that at least one of the defendants Mercedes Hafner was represented by New York Civil Rights Attorney Stanley L. Cohen so why not call him to get the other side of the story ? Too many times and this is one of them reporters talk to the US Attorney and get their spin on a story but don’t bother to get the other side. This is unfair and bad journalism.Also, for future info the National Lawyers Guild in NYC is setting up a legal defense team for these brave allegedly civil disobedient kids. These are for the most part KIDS who wanted to do something positive for the world unlike most brainwashed Lady Gaga loving kids in America and I love and support them for it.

Jul 21, 2011 9:21pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
edgyinchina wrote:
Tea Bagger Alert… Here’s a place where big money can be cut from the budget. This and the second trial of Roger Clements…. What a waste of money…. Millions and millions of dollars wasted….

Jul 21, 2011 9:32pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
diluded0000 wrote:
What these people did is analogous to making a prank phone call without turning off their caller ID. I would question what resources the FBI diverted to spend a bunch of tax dollars ruining people’s lives for downloading and running a computer program they likely didn’t even know was illegal. Meanwhile my credit card number gets stolen about every two years by real computer criminals who law enforcement never even makes the slightest effort to track down.

Jul 22, 2011 11:31am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.