Iran blamed U.S., Israel for killing of scientist

An undated image released by Iran's ISNA news agency of Iranian scientist Darioush Rezaie who was shot dead by a motorcyclist in Tehran July 24, 2011. REUTERS/ISNA/Handout

An undated image released by Iran's ISNA news agency of Iranian scientist Darioush Rezaie who was shot dead by a motorcyclist in Tehran July 24, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/ISNA/Handout

TEHRAN | Sun Jul 24, 2011 7:45am EDT

TEHRAN (Reuters) - A senior Iranian official on Sunday blamed the United States and Israel for the killing of an Iranian scientist, who the deputy interior minister said was not linked to Iran's nuclear program as reported by media.

Darioush Rezaie, 35, a university lecturer, was shot dead by gunmen in eastern Tehran Saturday. Some media reports said Rezaie was a nuclear scientist but Deputy Interior Minister Safarali Baratlou said this was not true.

Parliament Speaker Ali Larijani in a speech broadcast live on state TV blamed the United States and Israel for the killing.

"The terrorist action by American and the Zionist regime (Israel) yesterday ... is another example of the level of their animosity (against Iran)," he said.

Iranian media said security officials were investigating the killing.

Several nuclear scientists have been assassinated in Iran in the last few years.

One scientist was killed and another wounded in Tehran in November, which Iranian officials blamed Israel and the United States for. Washington dismissed that at the time.

It has not been officially confirmed whether Rezaie was involved in Iran's nuclear program, as reported by some media.

Lawmaker Zohreh Elahian said Rezaie had no links to Iran's nuclear program, which the United States and its allies say is a cover to build bombs.

"Rezaie was an elite Iranian physicist ... he was murdered by our country's enemies. But ... he didn't have any connection to Iran's nuclear activities," said Elahian, the semi-official Fars news agency reported.

Tehran governor Morteza Tamaddon warned that Iran "preserves the right to retaliate," the semi-official Mehr news agency reported. Tamaddon did not elaborate.

Iran, a major oil producer, says its nuclear program is solely for civilian purposes and so far has refused to halt its sensitive uranium enrichment activities, as demanded by the United Nations Security Council.

The refusal has led to the imposition of sanctions by the United Nations, the European Union and the United States.

Iranian MPs Sunday passed a bill obliging the government to impose sanctions on U.S. officials like former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, his deputy Paul Wolfowitz, and military commanders at U.S. detention centres Abu Ghraib in Iraq and Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

The bill, analysts say, is a retaliatory measure against blacklisting senior Iranian officials by Washington, who it says were responsible for human rights abuses in the Islamic state.

Iran rejects accusations about its human rights record.

(Writing by Parisa Hafezi)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (8)
Bob9999 wrote:
Here is an analysis based on the assumption that public statements from the Iranian are more likely to be false than true. Thus, one assumes that the statement that the victim was killed by the United States and Israel indicates that he was not killed by the United States or Israel, suggesting that he was killed by the Iranian regime itself. The statement that he was not a nuclear physicist would thus indicate that is the best clue that he was a nuclear physicist or, at least, a physicist with knowledge potentially applicable to a nuclear program. Thus, assuming that statements from the Iranian regime have a negative truth value, one could conclude that the victim was killed by the Iranian regime because he had knowledge that was applicable or potentially applicable to a nuclear program but had elected either not to be helpful or to be unhelpful to the Iranian regime. How close is that?

Jul 24, 2011 9:29am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Gaius_Baltar wrote:
Bob9999, if the victim was nuclear scientist, and if the Iranian gov’t wanted to silence him, they could have incarcerated him at a Bush-style secret prison.

Let us assume that statements from the Israeli gov’t have a negative truth value. One could conclude from Israeli denials–or silence in the face of accusations of complicity–that Israel killed the Iranian scientist. Given that Israel might feel constrained in trying to attack Iran (the recently retired head of the Mossad called it “the stupidest idea I’ve heard”), a covert war of assassination would be congruent with Israel’s phobia about Iran’s nuclear program.

Jul 24, 2011 9:55am EDT  --  Report as abuse
JamesChirico wrote:
If they deny his involvement in the nuclear program, you can be pretty sure he was part of it. With a PHD in physics not having him help is absurd.

Jul 24, 2011 11:42am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.