Analysis: In debt row, hints of emerging-economy crises

WASHINGTON | Sun Jul 24, 2011 5:59pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Debt default. A ratings downgrade. Political deadlock. Such terms, once associated primarily with the developing world, now abound in the mighty United States.

As the U.S. Congress flirts with the once-unthinkable prospect of not paying the country's bills, the heated battle over a usually routine vote to lift the country's debt ceiling is dealing another blow to America's image.

The global financial crisis, which was rooted in poor regulation of the U.S. housing and banking sectors, already tarnished perceptions of the United States overseas.

For political economy experts who have spent their careers focused on the emerging world, Washington's protracted debt stand-off is all too reminiscent of the divisions more typical of developing-country politics.

"We attend a lot of meetings with Latin Americans and we used to complain to them about the problems they had, and now they like to say to us: 'That sounds just like the U.S.'," said Peter Hakim, head of the Inter-American Dialogue, a policy group in Washington.

"What's really shocking is the inability to reach agreement. All of a sudden the U.S. is a democracy that is unable to find a compromise. We're polarized."

That sort of polarization is common in the developing world. The United States was often a critic of institutional disarray in places such as Brazil, where a multitude of parties makes it difficult to enact legislation, or Mexico, where the opposite problem -- long-standing one-party rule -- stifled political choice.

Yet the stalemate now facing the U.S. two-party system demonstrates the challenges of the divided government Americans voted for last November.

Given that the United States is home to not only the world's largest economy but also its most liquid and safe debt market, the repercussions of a U.S. financial meltdown are potentially much larger than a more contained emerging-markets crisis.

British Business Secretary Vince Cable told BBC television on Sunday that "right-wing nutters" in the U.S. Congress were holding up a deal to prevent a catastrophic default, posing a greater threat to the global financial system than the euro zone, which has been grappling with a debt crisis of its own.

Argentina's President Cristina Fernandez, whose own country defaulted on about $100 billion in debt a decade ago, asked last week: "When did the American dream become a nightmare?"

When advising the United States on how to deal with the budget crisis, ratings agency Moody's last week suggested the country eliminate the debt ceiling to prevent repeats of the kind of uncertainty now gripping financial markets.

Instead it suggested following the example of Chile, where increases in debt are constrained but not technically limited.

Fast-growing countries in Latin America, including Chile and Brazil, achieved a more sustained growth path in part due to reforms aimed at reducing their debt loads and reining in budget deficits.

COURTING A DOWNGRADE

The push from Republican leaders for sharp cuts in U.S. government spending, which many economists say would hurt a fragile recovery, has made the rating agencies a driving force for policy. They had come under fire for giving top-notch grades to shoddy real estate securities, contributing to the financial meltdown of 2007-08.

Ratings agencies played a central role in the emerging-market debt crises in Russia, Asia and Latin America in the late 1990s. Back then they were also criticized as too late to downgrade countries with questionable credit records.

If the United States is downgraded, interest rates could rise, risking a new recession. Some Wall Street economists say the recovery is already being hampered as the threat of a debt default deals a further blow to consumer confidence.

Another damaging consequence of the debt limit scuffle has been to shift the discussion away from doing more to bring down a 9.2 percent jobless rate to a debate over spending cuts that will most likely put a damper on economic growth.

Investors, who long brushed off the prospect of an outright default as highly unlikely, are increasingly concerned and shocked that the politicians in Washington have allowed the crisis to get this far.

"The extent of political dysfunctionality will stun many, especially at a time when America needs unity and common purpose in D.C. to also address high unemployment and other challenges," said Mohamed El-Erian, co-chief investment officer of the mega bond fund PIMCO, who writes columns for Reuters.

Haag Sherman, managing partner at Salient Partners, an investment firm in Houston, Texas, said the angry tone of U.S. politics harked back to the early days of the Republic, when the United States really was a developing nation.

"We were an emerging market then, and you have some of the hallmarks of an emerging economy today: increasing concentration of wealth, an entrenchment of the political class," he said.

(Additional reporting by Jennifer Ablan in New York; Editing by Dale Hudson)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (13)
ginchinchili wrote:
The lame-stream “news” media is so afraid of offending those on the right that they are slanting all of their news articles to read as if the problems in Washington, and in state governments, is equally split between Democrats and Republicans. This is a prevarication that allows the right more influence as it continue to drag us down a path of self-destruction. If you read between the lines of this article OBJECTIVELY, it becomes clear that the Republicans are using all of their considerable power to prevent the federal government from functioning, even at the risk of forcing America into a default.

It’s the same crap they pulled during the run up to the Iraq War. About 6 months after the initial invasion of Iraq, I saw a poll that said 70% of Americans believed that Saddam Hussein was behind the 9/11 attacks. How could our news media possibly allow our country to be taken to war by a president on what were obviously false premises?

There are multiple of examples of this throughout the past couple of decades and here we are again. Forget that nearly every credible economist agrees that some revenue increases must be implemented in order to bring the US budget in line. The bi-partisan debt commission included some revenue increases. The wealthy have been gaining income by double digits for decades while the Middle Class is increasingly slipping behind. US companies have been making record profits as our bridges, roads, and electrical grid crumble. Bush and the Republicans even refused to pay for the Iraq War. Indeed, for the first time in our history we cut taxes during a major military conflict. Our wealth disparity is greater than it’s ever been, resembling that of a banana republic, and yet the main-stream propaganda media sweeps all of these relevant facts under the rug in the name of appearing balanced.

By the same token, Americans are under the false impression that Obama has been spending money like a mad man and the Republicans are the Party of fiscal responsibility, but that impression is just not supported by the facts. Obama has initiated very little spending. What Obama has initiated amounts to about a quarter of what the Iraq War alone will eventually cost us. The comparison is not even close. Bush and the Republicans initiated trillions in endless spending and now they are the party that refuses to allow the Democrats to end the Bush tax cuts and close tax loopholes for billionaires buying corporate jets.

If our news media would properly inform the American people about what is really happening in our country, our government would be allowed to function a lot more effectively. Unfortunately, our news media is not living up to that responsibility. They find that airing propaganda is more profitable.

Jul 24, 2011 6:38pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
MarkMM wrote:
To default would be the cynical tactic used to further damage the economy, and President Obama in the process, brought to you by The Tea/Republican Party who will use this strategy to attempt to win the next election. Call them the “Take no prisoners party.” The Republicans care only about winning, so they can further implement their plan to undo the entire safetey net.

Jul 24, 2011 7:25pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
RPhillips111 wrote:
All of these economists, commentators, wall streeters, and globalists supported Obama in 2008, they ae supporting him now, and they cannot understand how the american people are revolting at a $14 trillion debt, a $1.6 trillion deficit for the current year and a Presient who wants to raise the debt limit by more than $3 trillion, taxes by a $100 billion a year, and still have a deficit of $1 trillion a year.

Qw need to cut spending by at least $1.6 trillion a year–discretionary funds from the regular budget–not Social Security, Medicare, or pensions.

Why don’t these loudmouths who gave us the financial crisis and promote deficint spending either change their big-spending tune or shut their big mouths?

I’m sick of big government big spenders–in or out of government.

Jul 24, 2011 9:08pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.