UPDATE 4-Entergy to fight for Vermont Yankee reactor survival
* Entergy to spend about $100 million to refuel reactor
* Entergy wants to keep reactor running until 2032
* Vermont wants reactor to shut in 2012 (Adds background)
By Scott DiSavino
NEW YORK, July 25 (Reuters) - Entergy Corp (ETR.N) said on
Monday it will refuel the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant
and fight to keep it running for another 20 years until 2032
when its new operating license expires.
Vermont's Governor, Peter Shumlin, who led the state legislature's effort to shut the 620-megawatt plant in 2010 when he was President of the Senate, wants the 39 year old reactor to shut next year when its old license was to expire.
After winning a 20 year extension of its operating license from federal regulators in March, New Orleans-based Entergy, the No. 2 nuclear power operator in the United States, in April sued in federal court to block the state from shutting the reactor next year. The trial is scheduled for mid-September.
"Our board believes both the merits of the company's legal position and the record strongly support its decision to continue to trial scheduled to begin on Sep. 12. On that basis, the decision was made to move forward with the refueling as planned," J. Wayne Leonard, Entergy's chairman and chief executive officer, said in a release.
The refueling, expected to start in October, will cost Entergy about $100 million - $65 million for the new uranium fuel and about $35 million for the refueling activities, the company has said.
During a typical refueling outage, which lasts about 30 days, Entergy said workers will replace about 120 fuel assemblies, or one-third of the fuel in the reactor core.
If Entergy is not successful in court and the reactor does shut, it would be the first U.S. nuclear plant to retire from service since 1998 when the 660 MW Unit 1 at Millstone in Connecticut closed.
ISO New England, which oversees the six-state New England power grid, has said shutting Vermont Yankee in 2012 could threaten the reliability of the electric grid in parts of Vermont, New Hampshire and Massachusetts. The plant represents 55 percent of the state's generating capacity.
The ISO is working with local power companies to bolster the transmission grid in case the reactor shuts next year.
Business groups in Vermont meanwhile are worried power prices will rise if the reactor shuts.
VERMONT IS UNIQUE
Vermont is the only state in the nation with a say on whether a nuclear reactor within its borders can continue operating.
Nuclear safety is a federal responsibility and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has already determined in March 2011 that Vermont Yankee was safe to run for another 20 years until 2032, but the state still wants it shut.
When Entergy bought the reactor for $180 million from New England utilities in 2002, the company agreed to seek permission from state regulators before operating the plant beyond March 21, 2012, when its original license expired.
After a radioactive tritium leak in 2010 hurt Entergy's efforts to convince state politicians to allow Vermont Yankee to continue operating for another 20 years, Entergy filed the complaint in federal court.
Other states, like New York, wish they had that kind of power over nuclear plants within their borders.
In neighboring New York, Gov. Andrew Cuomo and Attorney General Eric Schneiderman are using water permits and fire codes in an attempt to stop the 20-year renewal of the operating licenses of Entergy's 2,045-MW Indian Point reactors, which expire in 2013 and 2015. [ID:nN1E76J1D1]
Indian Point is located about 45 miles north of Manhattan in the nation's most heavily populated metropolitan area - home to more than 18 million people - where the plant's opponents say even the most unlikely chance of an accident is too much.
Some state politicians and environmental groups have been fighting for decades to shut Indian Point, but have been stymied by federal regulators who say the plant is safe.
But since the March 11 earthquake that crippled Japan's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant, relicensing Indian Point and other U.S. reactors has become even more contentious.
The NRC staff however has already determined Indian Point is safe to run for another 20 years. But it will take months before the NRC's judicial arm starts to hold hearings on the dozen or so contentions already filed against the renewal and likely years before the commission decides on the license extension after considering all the numerous expected appeals.
The NRC has never denied an application to extend a license, having already renewed licenses for 71 of the nation's 104 reactors, including Vermont Yankee. ----------------------------------------------------------- PLANT BACKGROUND/TIMELINE STATE: Vermont COUNTY: Windham TOWN: Vernon OPERATOR: Entergy Nuclear OWNER(S): Entergy Corp CAPACITY: 620 MW UNIT(S): General Electric Boiling Water Reactor FUEL: Nuclear DISPATCH: Baseload COST: $183 million TIMELINE: 1972 - Reactor enters commercial service 2002 - Entergy buys reactor for $180 million from
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power and enters a
10-year power purchase agreement to sell power
back to the former owners for about 4.5 cents
per kilowatt hour Jan 2006 - Entergy files with NRC to renew the original
40-year operating license for an additional 20
years Jan 2010 - Entergy identifies tritium leak Feb 2010 - Vermont Senate votes 26-4 against authorizing
the Vermont Public Service Board to issue a
certificate of public good that would allow for
the license renewal. Vermont is the only state
in the nation with the authority to block a
license renewal. The state gained that
authority when Entergy bought the plant Mar 2010 - Entergy stops tritium leak Nov 2010 - Entergy mulls sale of Vermont Yankee Mar 2011 - NRC approves of 20 year extension of operating
license Mar 2011 - Entergy drops plan to sell plant Apr 2011 - Entergy files complaint in federal district
court in Vermont to block the state from
forcing the plant to cease operation in March
2012 when the original operating license was to
expire Jul 2011 - Entergy decide to spend about $100 million to
refuel the reactor in October ($65 million for
the fuel and $35 million for the refueling
work) Sep 2011 - Trial in federal district court before the
Honorable J. Garvan Murtha decided not to to
block state from shutting reactor Oct 2011 - Entergy expects to shut reactor for refueling Mar 21, 2012 - Reactor to shut unless state approves of
extension or Entergy wins court case to keep
reactor operating or court appeals keep plant
alive Mar 2032 - Renewed license expires (Editing by John Picinich)
- Tweet this
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Reprints
Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.


Follow Reuters