Casey Anthony judge blasts media, holds back juror names

Related Topics

ORLANDO, Fla | Tue Jul 26, 2011 7:45pm EDT

ORLANDO, Fla (Reuters) - The names of jurors in the Casey Anthony murder trial will remain secret until at least October 25 to allow those enraged by her acquittal to "compose and restrain themselves," according to the judge's order on Tuesday.

Judge Belvin Perry acknowledged in his 13-page order that juror names must be disclosed eventually under Florida's broad Public Records laws. But he took the opportunity to complain about modern-day media.

After a 7-week nationally televised trial, Anthony was found not guilty July 5 of murdering her 2-year-old daughter Caylee in 2008, but was convicted of lying to law enforcement officers about Caylee's disappearance and sentenced to four years in jail.

After officials took into account time spent in jail awaiting trial and time off for good behavior, Casey Anthony was released on July 17.

Perry lamented what he said was the blurring of lines between news and entertainment, saying court proceedings have become just another form of mindless entertainment and a revenue source for broadcast networks.

"It was reported that television ratings for the trial were extraordinary. Clearly, the broadcast of an official and serious court proceeding such as this trial where a young girl was dead and her mother faced the death penalty devolved into cheap, soap-opera-like entertainment," Perry wrote.

"Unquestionably, use of Florida public records laws by the media ... has become simply a tool to sell a story. It is time that Florida's public records laws recognize this fact," Perry wrote.

He also advocated a new law to keep juror names secret in "specific, rare cases" both to protect jurors constitutional right to privacy and to prevent potential jurors from avoiding service.

Three jurors have already voluntarily identified themselves and talked about the verdict.

(Editing by Jerry Norton)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (12)
mrsparrish wrote:
Thumbs up, Judge Perry! Let ‘em have it, the whole lot of ‘em, starting with Nancy Grace. It is hard to believe she was ever in the legal field.

Jul 26, 2011 8:21pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
mrs.me wrote:
To say that people watched the trial in comparison to a soap opera is foolish. WE all cared for JUSTICE FOR CAYLEE….anyone with a heart cared about the outcome and the truth. We all wanted to see her mother face the consequences for not callin to even report her own daughter missing….WHAT A SHAME…..thank GOD for Nancy Grace who helps find the missing…she’s the voice that needs to be heard while the victim is in a swamp dead and can’t speak….

Jul 26, 2011 9:24pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
SANDIEGOCA71 wrote:
It’s ridiculous to say anything about Nancy Grace or vinny or anyone else reporting on the story. As for Nancy, she had it right from the start. The jury had trouble understanding circumstantial evidence, they just didn’t get it so now lives are threatened, she walks free and we have just out of puberty guys running around with signs asking Casey to marry them. Though I don’t wish harm on innocent people, I would have paid attention to the evidence and am grateful for the commentators, they did their job. We got the real story.

Jul 26, 2011 10:09pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.