New York challenges Defense of Marriage Act

Related Topics

NEW YORK | Tue Jul 26, 2011 6:36pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Two days after same-sex marriage became legal in New York, the state's attorney general has taken legal action challenging the constitutionality of the U.S. law which defines marriage as between a man and woman.

In court papers filed on Tuesday in U.S. federal court in Manhattan, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman said the Defense of Marriage Act, or DOMA, violates same-sex couples' right to equal protection under the U.S. Constitution.

The 1996 law prohibits same-sex couples from receiving marriage-based benefits such as Social Security survivor benefits, health benefits and the right to file taxes jointly.

Schneiderman argued the law intrudes on the state's right to regulate marriage. On Sunday, gay couples began to marry in New York after it was made legal.

New York is the sixth and largest U.S. state to allow same-sex marriage. Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont and the District of Columbia also do so.

"By discriminating among married couples based on sexual orientation and sex, DOMA deprives New York of the ability to extend true equality to all marriages valid in the State," Schneiderman wrote.

Schneiderman made his arguments in support of a case brought by Edie Windsor, a woman who sued the United States last year after an inheritance from her former partner was taxed. Windsor, who was married in Canada in 2007, said she had to pay $350,000 in inheritance tax in 2009 after the federal government refused to recognize her marriage.

Windsor argued she "was forced to pay in violation of the constitutional guarantee of equal protection of the law."

In February, the Obama administration announced it would no longer defend the Defense of Marriage Act's section which defines marriage as between a man and woman.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
Eideard wrote:
From early days after NY entered the civil rights battle against racism – history repeats itself. To the same positive goals and end, so say Americans who still believe in our Constitution.

Jul 26, 2011 8:00pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
SteveMD2 wrote:
DOMA is just another variant of the marriage license scam. After blacks were allowed to marry in 1867, the scam to stop marriages for them became “marriage licenses”. It worked because blacks in general could not afford the fees. Same as the poll tax scam.

We’ve passed hate crimes legislation, ended DADT, marriage in NY, Civil Unions in DE, IL, HI and RI. DOMA has to go also.

It doesnt defend marriage, it defends bigotry and hate of people who love one another.

thanks primarily to the southern evangelical churches who were the bullwark of slavery and gave us segregation and the KKK

And the catholic church of the endless hidden molestation of children all over the world where it operates.

BTW the church babbles about protecting life. Yet it was intimately involved in supporting the nazis in WWII.

Go to WWWW.NOBELIEFS.COM/NAZIS.HTM TO SEE ABOUT 80 PIX THAT TELL THE STORY.

Jul 27, 2011 8:10pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
SteveMD2 wrote:
And I should add that polls show catholics support CIVIL marriage for gays by about 50%, and their younger people by 2 to 1. Civil unions by the catholic populace by 3 to 1

MUch of the fight by the caTHOLIC church is just to take attention away from the endless hidden molestation of children.

Jul 27, 2011 8:13pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.