UK lawmakers seek James Murdoch hacking "clarification"

LONDON Fri Jul 29, 2011 8:32am EDT

BSkyB Chairman James Murdoch appears before a parliamentary committee on phone hacking at Portcullis House in London July 19, 2011. REUTERS/Parbul TV via Reuters Tv

BSkyB Chairman James Murdoch appears before a parliamentary committee on phone hacking at Portcullis House in London July 19, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Parbul TV via Reuters Tv

Related Topics

LONDON (Reuters) - British lawmakers said on Friday they would write to News Corp's James Murdoch asking him to give more details about evidence on phone hacking he gave to a parliamentary committee, following claims his testimony was "mistaken."

But the Culture, Media and Sport Committee voted against recalling Murdoch, News Corp's deputy chief operating officer, as some of its members had demanded.

The committee wants Murdoch, chairman of News Corp's British newspaper arm News International, to clarify details he provided earlier this month about phone-hacking allegations at the News of the World tabloid.

"We are going to write to ask for further details on areas where evidence is disputed," said the committee's chairman John Whittingdale.

The decision comes after Tom Crone, News International's former top legal officer, and Colin Myler, editor of the News of the World until it was shut down earlier this month, issued a statement saying some of Murdoch's evidence was wrong.

Myler and Crone said they had told him of an email from a News of the World reporter to "Neville" containing transcripts of hacked voicemails.

Neville Thurlbeck was chief reporter on the weekly when it published a story about English soccer executive Gordon Taylor. Murdoch later approved a large payout to Taylor, but told the committee he had not been in possession of all the facts when he approved it.

Whittingdale said the committee would also write to Crone and Myler and News International's then lawyers Harbottle and Lewis to provide further information.

"Once we have received those replies ... we expect to receive them very shortly, the committee will meet again, probably in about two weeks' time to determine what further actions to make," he added.

Allegations of hacking at News Corp's British newspapers, in particular reports that journalists accessed the voicemails of murder victims, have triggered a judicial inquiry and calls from some politicians to cap News Corp's media ownership.

It has already led to Rupert Murdoch's global media empire dropping its $12 billion bid for the 61 percent of pay-TV broadcaster BSkyB it does not own.

"It's my view that Murdoch, Crone and Myler should have been invited today," said committee member, Tom Watson.

"We did take a vote and it was not successful. But I understand from the decision we took that when we receive the evidence no later than August 11, we are meeting the week after that to decide whether to invite them at that point."

(Reporting by Tim Castle; Editing by Steve Addison)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
Sevare wrote:
What infuriates me the most is when politicians take it on themselves to set-up enquiries which they are clearly under qualified to adjudicate. The questions we witnessed were often more about attempting to impress the general population than to ascertain the actual facts about the case. Often the questions are one off sound bites which the person is trained to bat back with ease.

Reviews of this nature should be led and operated by those skilled in the art of ascertaining the truth through tough, thought out approach. Questions which will open up the case or lead us to better understand where the liability falls.

You may have noticed that all questions which had NOTW in a positive light were concise and definitive. What sort of answer for a senior board member let alone someone with direct responsibility for the entire organisation is “not to my knowledge.

i ask you what was the point of spending all this money on this review if all we get is showboating and no confidence that we are any closer to allocating responsibility.

I am not unhappy with News Corp but with fame seeking politicians who think they are better placed to get a result in this situation than professionals. We want results whether positive or negative is not the issue they do however need to be conclusive.

Jul 29, 2011 9:08am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.