Factbox: Key elements of U.S. debt deal

Mon Aug 1, 2011 10:18am EDT

Related Interactive

(Reuters) - President Barack Obama announced on Sunday that Republican and Democratic leaders had agreed on a last-ditch deal to raise the U.S. borrowing limit and avoid a catastrophic default, and he urged lawmakers to "do the right thing" and approve the agreement.

Here is a summary of the deal, based on documents provided by both parties, as well as interviews with lawmakers and aides:

* The deal would allow President Barack Obama to raise the debt ceiling in three steps. Congress would get a chance to register its disapproval on two of these, but would not be able to block them unless it musters a two-thirds vote in both the House and the Senate -- an unlikely prospect.

* It envisions spending cuts of roughly $2.4 trillion over 10 years, which Congress would approve in two steps -- an initial $917 billion when the deal passes Congress and another $1.5 trillion by the end of the year.

* The first group of spending cuts would apply to the discretionary programs that Congress approves annually, covering everything from the military to food inspection.

* Those programs would be capped each year for 10 years. The caps would be relatively modest at first to avoid stifling the shaky economy -- spending for the fiscal year that begins October 1 would be only $6 billion below the current level of $1.049 trillion. The caps would have a greater impact in later years, when it is hoped that the economy will have recovered.

* Some $350 billion of the $917 billion total would come from defense and other security programs which now account for more than half of all discretionary spending. Republicans are resisting this idea and it is one of the few areas of dispute left.

* Automatic across-the-board spending cuts would kick in if Congress does not observe the caps in coming years.

* A 12-member congressional committee, made up equally of Republicans and Democrats from each chamber, would be tasked with finding a further $1.5 trillion in budget savings.

* That committee could find savings from an overhaul of the tax code and restructuring benefit programs like Medicare -- the politically risky decisions that lawmakers have not been able to agree on so far.

* The committee would have to complete its work by November 23. Congress would have an up-or-down vote, with no modifications, on the committee's recommendations by December 23.

* If the committee cannot agree on at least $1.2 trillion in savings, or Congress rejects its findings, automatic spending cuts totaling that amount would kick in starting in 2013.

* Those cuts would fall equally on domestic and military programs. Medicare would face automatic cuts as well, but Social Security, Medicaid, federal employee pay, and benefits for veterans and the poor would be exempt.

* The plan also calls for both the House and the Senate to vote on a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution by the end of the year. It is not likely to receive the two-thirds vote in each chamber needed for passage, but its inclusion will make it easier for conservatives to back the overall deal.

(Reporting by Andy Sullivan; editing by Christopher Wilson)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (37)
FlimFlamMan wrote:
Elections have consequences. Conservatives won the House. I say reject this ‘compromise’ as it leaves too much room for the socialists to change things later. Let Obama and the Dems EAT IT and suffer the defeat they deserve next election cycle!

Aug 01, 2011 8:37am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Chaz54 wrote:
Dont mean this to be a repeat as am having computer problems, but this sure reminds me of my last visit to my Dr for a physical… there i was bent over the examination table, shorts around my ankles and hearing the smack of rubber gloves snapping on his stubby fingers and he says “This Is Gonna Hurt”

Aug 01, 2011 8:41am EDT  --  Report as abuse
GrannyRob wrote:
The Boehner-Reid “compromise” is disgusting. Nancy Pelosi gets to sit on a “trigger” commission? How many dumb bunnies seriously believe taxes won’t be raised and very soon? I DON’T WANT to play footsie with government thieves who constantly buy constituencies via government programs. The American public and the good old boys of the GOP and the deaf, dumb and blind public have failed to realize that we’re dealing with criminals! Democrats and muddy-brained moderates created this situation, and dumb voters especially in the elections of 2006 and 2008 aided and abetted them, and put this country on a certain path to destruction. If America continues going down, nobody should escape to come out sitting pretty, NOBODY! … except maybe the new House Republicans who forced the passage of Cut, Cap and Balance and stand taller than the wimps and criminals among those running the U.S. into the ground! No deal at all is better than continuing this stinking charade.

Aug 01, 2011 8:46am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus