WRAPUP 11-House approves U.S. debt deal a day before deadline

Mon Aug 1, 2011 7:25pm EDT

* Deal now heads to expected easier vote in Senate

* Congress approval by Tuesday will lift default risk

* Lingering fears remain over U.S. credit downgrade (Updates with House voting to approve debt limit deal)

By Richard Cowan and Andy Sullivan

WASHINGTON, Aug 1 (Reuters) - The House of Representatives on Monday approved an 11th-hour deal to raise the U.S. borrowing limit, clearing the biggest hurdle to averting a potentially catastrophic U.S. debt default.

Just one day before the deadline to lift the debt ceiling, the passage by 269 votes to 161 by the Republican-controlled House paved the way for an expected approval in the Senate of a $2.1 trillion deficit-cutting plan hammered out over the weekend.

The Democratic-led Senate was expected to vote on the plan on Tuesday.

Financial markets worldwide have been rattled by uncertainty over whether the compromise plan could pass the House in the face of objections from conservative Tea Party Republicans and from liberal Democrats.

Having a deal in place by Tuesday to raise the U.S. government's $14.3 trillion borrowing limit will remove the risk of the United States not being able to borrow money to pay all of its bills.

<^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Full coverage of U.S. budget and debt [ID:nUSBUDGET]

FACTBOX-Elements of US debt deal [ID:nN1E76T0AF]

Graphics package r.reuters.com/nud82s

Live blog here

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^>

A debt default by the world's largest economy would send shockwaves through the international economic system.

In the hours leading up to the House vote, Republican and Democratic leaders worked furiously to sell their rank-and-file on a deal reached with President Barack Obama in a bid to end an acrimonious impasse that has undermined Americans' faith in their political institutions and hurt America's image abroad.

But fears remained that the United States could still be hit by a damaging credit ratings downgrade, which would raise U.S. borrowing costs, threatening a fragile economic recovery and rattling global investors.

The compromise plan calls for spending cuts over 10 years but no new taxes, creates a powerful new congressional committee to recommend a deficit-reduction package by late November and raises the U.S. borrowing limit into 2013.

It was hard to identify winners in a bitter fight that appeared to be finally winding toward a conclusion after Sunday's compromise agreement.

Obama had to accept deeper spending cuts than he wanted and will have to defend them to his liberal base during his campaign for re-election in 2012, but he could win points with moderates and independents he needs to win a second term.

Boehner, the top U.S. Republican, got cuts he demanded without immediate tax increases, but had to fight an image of being inflexible and a captive of his party's Tea Party wing.

Americans anxious to reduce the country's 9.2 percent jobless rate became increasingly frustrated as the debate raged on through the summer. (Additional reporting by Richard Cowan, Dave Clarke, Thomas Ferraro, Donna Smith, Andy Sullivan, Lily Kuo, Margaret Chadbourn, Jeff Mason, Caren Bohan an Alister Bull; Writing by Matt Spetalnick and Pascal Fletcher, Editing by Stuart Grudgings and Doina Chiacu)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (19)
jnmiller wrote:
The article says, “Obama had to accept deeper spending cuts than he wanted and will have to defend them to his liberal base during his campaign for re-election in 2012, but he could win points with moderates and independents he needs to win a second term.” Please give us all a break! No he didn’t. There were no real spending cuts. $900+ billion over 10 years is not spending cuts. It’s a joke. This nation, thanks to this leadership (on both sides of the aisle), has done nothing to address the problems we have. We are watching the end of our nation at the hands of fools who think you can borrow your way to prosperity. There is no understanding by the politicians, or the media for that matter, of simple economics. If all this debt were such a great thing then we should all go as far into debt as possible in our own personal finances. That’d make us prosperous!…NOT!!! We are a society of fools destined to destroy ourselves. May our children and grandchildren forgive us.

Aug 01, 2011 7:54pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Strab wrote:
The President and the Democrats got exactly what they wanted. The spending cuts over 10 years will never see the light of day after 1 or at most 2 years. The Republican leadership are all a bunch of morons. All they had to do is look at history. Reagan was promised $3 in cuts (over 10 years) for every $1 in tax increases, the increases went into effect immediately and the cuts never materialized. The same happened to President Bush Sr (remember “read my lips”), he also fell for this ploy from the Democrats. It’s time to get rid of the Republican “leadership” who always fall in line with the wishes of the opposition because they want to be liked. They couldn’t stand on principle if their lives depended on it. What a bunch of wimps!

Aug 01, 2011 8:06pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
rlroll2 wrote:
It’s interesting to have closely watched the debt-ceiling debate unfold over the last month and to now watch the spin. Pres. Obama, though he rarely took the time to participate, was seen throughout as ineffectual. He never did present a plan of his own, was heavily criticized by his own party for lack of leadership and was eventually relegated to the sidelines-seen as an impediment by both sides. Less than 24 hours after the deal was reached, he is now portrayed as tough nosed and in control. A man willing to defend budget cuts in spite of his base. He even made the Washington Post’s “Winners List”, despite an overall approval rating that went steadily downward, bottoming out Saturday at 40%. I believe the sky-is-falling, apocalyptic rhetoric used by Democrats drew enough attention to the matter as it unfolded that the spin will be ineffectual. It is, never the less, an extremely sad and disheartening event to see blatant dishonesty in a profession where most of its members once placed integrity above all else.

Aug 01, 2011 8:28pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.