Childhood hardship tied to adulthood disease risks

Related Topics

A boy walks near water spraying from an open fire hydrant in the Williamsburg neighborhood of Brooklyn, New York July 5, 2010. REUTERS/Eric Thayer

A boy walks near water spraying from an open fire hydrant in the Williamsburg neighborhood of Brooklyn, New York July 5, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Eric Thayer

NEW YORK | Wed Aug 3, 2011 5:21pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Children who are abused, lose a parent, or suffer other hardships may have increased risks of chronic health conditions later in life, a new study suggests.

The study, of more than 18,000 adults from 10 countries, found that those who said they'd faced childhood "adversities" -- like abuse, the death of a parent or a parent's alcohol or drug abuse -- had higher risks of a number of medical conditions.

Those included heart disease, arthritis, asthma, diabetes and chronic back pain or headaches.

The same pattern was seen among people who said they'd suffered from depression, anxiety or other mental health conditions before the age of 21.

The findings, reported in the Archives of General Psychiatry, do not prove that serious stresses in childhood directly cause poor physical health later on.

But there are a number of reasons the two could be connected, said lead researcher Kate M. Scott, a psychologist and associate professor at the University of Otago in New Zealand.

"Early adverse experiences can shape people's behavior and lifestyle," Scott told Reuters Health by email. For example, she said, some people may end up smoking, drinking or over-eating as a way to deal with the stress of those childhood experiences, and the memories of them.

Similarly, Scott explained, young people with depression or other mental health disorders may learn to use smoking or drinking as a way to "self-medicate."

"So both early-life adversities and mental disorders may independently influence health-related behavior," she said.

But it's also possible that lasting and severe stress early in life has more-direct biological effects, according to Scott.

In times of stress, the body releases "stress hormones" like adrenalin and cortisol. That's fine in the short-term.

"But when the stress is ongoing, such as in long-term childhood maltreatment," Scott said, "then there can be health consequences of those hormonal responses being consistently elevated."

The findings are based on interviews with 18,300 adults from 10 countries, including the U.S., France, Germany, Italy, Japan and Mexico.

Scott's team found that participants who reported at least three childhood adversities had higher risks of all six physical health problems that the study assessed. In particular, they had twice the risk of heart disease, compared with men and women who reported no adversities.

Similar findings were seen among adults who said they'd had mental health conditions before age 21 -- especially depression, post-traumatic stress disorder or panic disorder.

Their risks of heart disease, asthma, arthritis and chronic back pain or headaches were anywhere from 43 percent to 66 percent higher, versus adults who reported no early mental health disorders.

Current psychological conditions did not appear to account for the link: the study participants were screened for those, and there was still a connection between early mental health problems and later physical health problems.

The study has its limitations -- including the reliance on people's memories and self-reports of health problems.

It also only looked at relative risks across large groups of people - in other words, comparisons, rather than the percentage of people who actually had a given condition. So the findings do not mean that any one person who suffered abuse or depression as a child is destined to develop heart disease.

For any one individual, Scott said, the increase in physical health risks could be modest.

But across a society, she noted, that could translate into a large impact, since these mental and physical health problems are all common.

"At least two-thirds of most populations will experience one of those chronic physical conditions at some stage in their lives," Scott said, "and a fairly similar proportion will experience a mental disorder at some stage."

She said people should recognize that mental well-being is an important factor in physical health as well. "So this is another important reason for individuals to seek mental health treatment if they are having ongoing problems."

SOURCE: bit.ly/pLO9dO Archives of General Psychiatry, August 2011.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
StephanGregor wrote:
It is sad that corporate medicine invests so little in meta-research before spending so much money (and wasting time where people might have found relief from their suffering sooner) and too often arriving at causal factors, but without touching on the etiology. The truths they are seeking are often quite simple, and visible when approached with an open compassionate mind.
Vancouver (B.C.) doctor Gabor Mate, now retired, authored a book in which he describes patterns of specific illness connected with patterns of specific childhood (mental/emotional) traumas. He explores and explains the vital connections between the endocrine system (the emotional triggers), the immune, and how imbalances play out.
I found the book absolutely revelatory and containing none of the slippery truths and evidential assumptions too often found in “home grown” medical-science treatises.
Anyone suffering a chronic condition, including PTSD, will find an “aha” moment somewhere in this book. I am not associated with Dr. Mate or his publications in any way. I am simply grateful to have found a new way of looking at my suffering.
The title: When the Body Says No: The Cost of Hidden Stress.

Aug 03, 2011 9:16pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Myche wrote:
As you get older from the time you were born the probability for risk factors for that could lead to illness in adult life increases. Also in taking an older person who has a medical condition and looking back into that person’s life for risk factors is a perilous search especially today because technology has changed peoples life styles quickly many times from the beginning of the 20th century to the present. What is a hardship is different for each age group level even in the same generation. Is a hardship really a hardship if it is not seen as a hardship by the individual at the time? What is what we consider a hardship today was seen by the person at the time as just one of those things that happens in life. If the use of alcohol and the emotional stresses is not seen as a hardship but just the way people behaved normally and accepted as a fact of life that was normal to the way people lived would it be a stresser to everyone or just to the people who couldn’t cope. And what would the reason be they couldn’t cope? Emotional alcoholic behavior is normal so what would the stresser be?

What I am saying is that taking an older person with a health condition and looking for stressers in the person’s past and then saying that since this factor is in the person’s past any one who experiences that stresser today as a young person has a high probability of having a heath condition when they are older is based on a faulty premise.

Its a faulty premise because stressers are relative to the historical period and cultural climate at the time when the person was young. What stress out people today may have been an accepted fact of life in the past. This is especially true of death of a parent and effects of alcohol influenced behaviours.

Aug 04, 2011 7:55pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Myche wrote:
As you get older from the time you were born the probability for risk factors for that could lead to illness in adult life increases. Also in taking an older person who has a medical condition and looking back into that person’s life for risk factors is a perilous search especially today because technology has changed peoples life styles quickly many times from the beginning of the 20th century to the present. What is a hardship is different for each age group level even in the same generation. Is a hardship really a hardship if it is not seen as a hardship by the individual at the time? What is what we consider a hardship today was seen by the person at the time as just one of those things that happens in life. If the use of alcohol and the emotional stresses is not seen as a hardship but just the way people behaved normally and accepted as a fact of life that was normal to the way people lived would it be a stresser to everyone or just to the people who couldn’t cope. And what would the reason be they couldn’t cope? Emotional alcoholic behavior is normal so what would the stresser be?

What I am saying is that taking an older person with a health condition and looking for stressers in the person’s past and then saying that since this factor is in the person’s past any one who experiences that stresser today as a young person has a high probability of having a heath condition when they are older is based on a faulty premise.

Its a faulty premise because stressers are relative to the historical period and cultural climate at the time when the person was young. What stress out people today may have been an accepted fact of life in the past. This is especially true of death of a parent and effects of alcohol influenced behaviours.

Aug 04, 2011 7:57pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.