U.S. military trainers could be targets: Iraq's Sadr

BAGHDAD Sun Aug 7, 2011 9:50am EDT

Anti-U.S. Shi'ite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr prays during his visit to the holy shrine of Imam Hussein in Kerbala, 110 km (70 miles) south of Baghdad January 9, 2011. REUTERS/Stringer

Anti-U.S. Shi'ite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr prays during his visit to the holy shrine of Imam Hussein in Kerbala, 110 km (70 miles) south of Baghdad January 9, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Stringer

Related Topics

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Iraq's fiercely anti-U.S. cleric Moqtada al-Sadr has warned that U.S. military trainers will be targets if they stay in the country beyond a year-end deadline for American troops to leave.

The statement from Sadr, whose Mehdi Army militia fought U.S. troops until 2008, follows a deal by Iraqi leaders to allow Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki to negotiate with the United States on whether to keep trainers in Iraq after the deadline.

Sadr followers have sent mixed messages on that, but any deal to keep U.S. troops in Iraq, even as trainers, remains a sensitive issue in Baghdad and Washington eight years after the U.S. invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein.

"Whoever stays in Iraq will be treated as an unjust invader and should be opposed with military resistance," Sadr said in a statement published on a pro-Sadr website on Saturday.

"A government which agrees for them to stay, even for training, is a weak government."

Sadr's Mehdi Army militia has for the most part demobilized, but U.S. officials say Sadrist splinter groups have continued to attack U.S. troops still stationed in Iraq.

Violence in Iraq has eased sharply since sectarian bloodshed peaked four years ago, but bombings and assassinations are still carried out almost daily by Sunni Islamists, some tied to al Qaeda, and by Shi'ite militas the U.S. government says are backed by Iran.

Sadr himself is now part of mainstream politics and a key ally to Maliki in his fragile power-sharing coalition among Shi'ite, Sunni and Kurdish blocs.

Sadr's representatives walked out of last week's discussions on U.S. troops, signaling possible dissension within the coalition.

U.S. and Iraqi officials agree that Iraq's security forces are capable of taking on internal threats, but say they need training in heavy conventional weaponry like tanks, and in air and naval defenses.

Details of any deal are far from clear, and an agreement would need to pass through parliament, say U.S. officials, who want legal immunity for any residual U.S. military presence.

Sadr has in the past threatened to revive his Shi'ite Mehdi Army if U.S. troops stay, but Sadrist sources have said the militia is riven with splinter groups and internal divisions.

(Reporting by Aseel Kami; writing by Patrick Markey; editing by Alistair Lyon)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
gemini51 wrote:
This is ever the dilemma with a moral democracy. Such inciting to murder is tolerated, even in a war setting, because we believe in free speech. Other countries would deal with this hate-monger expeditiously and efficiently. He should be thankful it is a Western nation he is attacking. Few others would tolerate him. He is also an example of why there should be separation of religion and state. He uses his religious position as a bully pulpit to spread hate and dissension. I fear the people of Iraq will suffer greatly at the hands of people of Sadr’s ilk when the U.S. leaves.

Aug 07, 2011 9:14am EDT  --  Report as abuse
JamVee wrote:
This guy would be the perfect candidate for another Osama Bin Laden style military elimination raid . . . “Two to the center of mass, and one to the head”!

Aug 07, 2011 10:23am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Randy549 wrote:
It is the *Iraqi* government that is making noises about wanting the Americans to stay longer than the end of the year. By and large, the Americans would just like to get the heck out of there and return home now that the job is done.

If Sadr has a beef with the decisions of the Iraqi government, he should take it up with *them* rather than throwing a temper tantrum by inciting his followers to kill Americans.

The first American soldier that is harmed as a result of Sadr’s incitement actions, should result in Sadr becoming an official “target” of the U.S. himself.

Enough is enough.

Aug 07, 2011 12:10pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Pictures