RPT-GLOBAL ECONOMY WEEKAHEAD-That 1937 feeling all over again

Mon Aug 8, 2011 7:00am EDT

 (Repeats item from Sunday)
 By Emily Kaiser
 SINGAPORE, Aug 8 (Reuters) - U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman
Ben Bernanke, an expert on the Great Depression, once promised
that the central bank would never repeat its 1937 mistake of
rushing to tighten monetary policy too soon and prolonging an
economic slump.
 He has been true to his word, keeping interest rates near
zero since late 2008 and more than tripling the size of the
Fed's balance sheet to $2.85 trillion. But cutbacks in
government spending may end up having a similarly chilling
effect on the economy, and there is little Bernanke can do to
counter that.
 Back in 1937, the U.S. economy had been growing rapidly for
three years, thanks in large part to government programs aimed
at ending the deep recession that began in 1929.
 Then the central bank clamped down hard on lending, and
federal government spending dropped 10 percent. The economy
contracted again in 1938. The jobless rate soared.
 "Regarding the Great Depression. You're right, we did it.
We're very sorry. But thanks to you, we won't do it again,"
Bernanke said back in 2002 at a conference honoring legendary
economist Milton Friedman's 90th birthday.
<^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
 ANALYSIS on U.S. policy options:       [ID:nN1E772077] 
 PREVIEW of China economic data:        [ID:nL3E7J31SV]
 Bernanke's 2002 speech:
here
 For IFR's forecasts for the week ahead in U.S. economic
data, please click on: link.reuters.com/waw92s
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^>
 Bernanke convenes the Fed's next policy-setting meeting on
Tuesday, facing growing concern that the United States may be
slipping into another recession while Europe staggers toward a
deeper debt crisis. Standard & Poor's decision on Friday to
lower the U.S. credit rating adds yet another element of
uncertainty.
 His options are limited.
 Nigel Gault, chief U.S. economist at IHS Global Insight,
said the Fed could promise to keep interest rates near zero or
its balance sheet swollen for even longer than investors
anticipate. Or it could buy even more U.S. government debt.
 "It is hard to see any of these options as 'game
changers,'" Gault said. "The Fed would be doing them not
because it could be sure they would make a huge difference, but
because it would feel the need to do something."
 Gault put the odds of another recession at 40 percent.
 However, Friday's U.S. employment figures soothed recession
fears, showing the economy created 117,000 jobs in July. That
was up from a revised 46,000 in June and prior months payrolls
were revised up slightly. The unemployment rate slipped to 9.1
percent but mostly because workers dropped out of the labor
force.
 "While I do not think this sounds the all-clear signal, it
does quell some of the conversation that the U.S. is falling
back into a recession," said Tom Porcelli, chief U.S. economist
at RBC Capital Markets in New York.
 "Having said that, there are still plenty of headwinds,
like Europe. I am also very encouraged to see the upward
revisions to the previous months. This report pulls us back
from the ledge a little bit."
 HITTING A POTHOLE
 Full employment is one of the Fed's prescribed goals, and
it is clearly falling short. Government spending cuts are
making matters worse. Friday's employment report showed a net
loss of 37,000 government jobs last month.
 State and local governments with balanced budget rules had
little choice but to cut jobs in order to make ends meet. The
federal government has no such restriction, but its spending
outside of defense fell at a 7.3 percent annual rate in the
second quarter, crimping economic growth.
 Michael Feroli, an economist with JPMorgan in New York,
said he had held out some hope that Congress would approve some
form of additional fiscal support in the coming months, but the
debt ceiling fight showed lawmakers dead set against that.
 "It now looks likely that growth could hit a pothole early
next year," Feroli said.
 He cut his growth forecast for the first half of 2012 to
2.0 percent from 2.5 percent. At that sluggish pace, the
jobless rate won't fall much below 9.0 percent, keeping the Fed
on hold until at least the middle of 2013, Feroli said.
 Without fiscal help, the Fed will be under greater pressure
to find some other way to lift growth. Another round of
government bond purchases would no doubt elicit wails of
protest from emerging markets, which contend that the Fed's
easy money spills into their economies, driving up inflation.
 China, whose $1.16 trillion in Treasury holdings are second
only to the Fed's, has not been shy about expressing its
concern over the state of U.S. public finances and the dollar's
slide.
 Yang Jiechi, China's foreign minister, said on Friday that
Washington should enact "responsible monetary policies" to
ensure global economic stability, a thinly veiled reference to
the Fed's bond-buying programs.
 China releases its monthly economic data this week. The
figures are expected to show double-digit gains in industrial
output and retail sales, suggesting the country's economic
growth remains robust.
 Strong growth in China has helped to lift the rest of Asia,
outside of Japan, which is still hurting from the March
earthquake and tsunami. But all bets are off if conditions
worsen significantly in the United States.
 "Our view is that the region can 'decouple' from modest
slowdowns, and we think the ongoing slowdown qualifies as
modest," said TJ Bond, emerging Asia economist at Bank of
America-Merrill Lynch in Hong Kong.
 "We would start to worry if the U.S. tipped over into
recession."
 (Editing by Dan Grebler)


We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
docroc wrote:
I don’t think Fed policy is the problem; ie more liquidity, lower interest rates (lower than zero?!) are not going to make already cash-besotted corporations want to expand/hire.

We need J-O-B-S!! Only the government can provide those in the absence of hiring by the private sector. Deciding to cut government programs is a huge mistake at this time in the depression (oops, recession).

Congress and their insane desire to eviscerate the federal budget (except, of course, the giant killing machine we call “Defense”) is the problem. Along with a president too bent on cooperation to take the strong leadership stance necessary to deal with this congress.

Aug 08, 2011 7:39am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Innocentious wrote:
The idea that hiring people to purchase more goods from China in order to create economic stability is a fallacy in and of itself. The creation of more jobs ( especially Government Jobs ) in which we create infrastructure we don’t need OR desk jobs we have no use of is not a solution but in and of itself a symptom of the economic conundrum that we have entered into in these last 50 years.
We cannot tax our way out, we cannot as some suggest spend our way out. No, we need to deregulate our way out, and incentivise our way out. Of course that would mean creating more wealthy people in the United States which for some strange reason has become a bad thing.
This is again ironic as the reason Clinton was able to pay down the debt in 2000 was because the United States had made more ‘wealthy’ people. In 1996 ( when we had higher taxes and still ran a deficit ) the rich made $800 Billion a year. In 2000 the Rich made $1.7 Trillion and that extra money allowed Clinton to pay down the debt. Then of course the crash came ( unfortunately ) and Bush, even if he had done nothing, would have been spending more than he brought in again as we went from the wealthy making $1.7 Trillion to $1.39 Trillion, then the next year $1.25 Trillion and the year after that $1.35 Trillion. In other words spending continued to go up while revenues for 4 years remained low and down. We finally got back to $1.7 Trillion in ‘rich’ people revenue but we had also had 4 years of accelerated government growth in an effort to ‘boost’ the economy, much like this article leans heavily in favor of.
The Irony is that I myself am a student of the Great Depression, to be honest I think that many, including the esteemed Ben Bernanke take away the wrong ideas from the Depression and how we got out of it. However since I am not in a position of authority to make the changes that I know would get us out I can do but little, adding my own opinion and railing against the known outcome of our current fiscal policy in Washington and the Federal Reserve. Watching with a sinking pit in my stomach as I see things getting worse and worse and knowing that the little that can be done is not going to be done.
Stop blaming Bush for the predicament we are in, I hated the man’s policies but it was not his fault the economy overextended itself, and to be honest at least it felt good while it was happening, if anything blame him for spending too much and not having the guts to admit that his Keynesian economic policies could not fix what had happened. Then blame Obama for hiring a lousy economic team that again believed that all that had to happen was spending. That no other policy or attempt to create wealth was attempted, rather his attack on Cooperate America has been one long laundry list of complaints and threats. I know more than one Businessman who has lost nearly everything and could do little but sigh as he laid off wave after wave of employee until he finally went into bankruptcy, lost it all, and is now destitute ( since most business men/women leverage EVERYTHING they often come out worse than the people they employ when a business dies )
Anyway, it is sad to see the men and women running this country took the wrong lessons away from the Great Depression, that our education system, rather than creating people who understand and can make common sense decisions, and challenge the conventional wisdom that Keynes was both right and wrong about his economic model and apply a little bit of creative and critical thinking instead simply accept what teachers in college classes spoon feed them ( I was there too people ) rather than dig in and understand managed to get into the White House and suggest one of the least productive dumbest economic policies I have seen in a long time ( throw a large chunk of money at the problem and it will go away ) and that includes both the Bush and the Obama teams.

Aug 08, 2011 9:03am EDT  --  Report as abuse
DrJJJJ wrote:
Automation, internet based business,the world marketplace, computers, stock holders wanting double digit returns and a leaner work force, massive Fed/state debt and government at 40% of US GDP is doing in jobs and the odds of “recovery”-recovery to what? free homes/loans, bigger government, credit ext beyond our ability to pay? Time for deflation for a generation folks, we’re living miles above our means! Perhaps we come out the other end a better country? It’ll take a greater appreciation for decent morals/ethics too FYI-much cheaper!

Aug 08, 2011 11:20am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.