Arizona appeals to Supreme Court on immigration law

WASHINGTON Wed Aug 10, 2011 5:59pm EDT

Related Topics


Under the Iron Dome

Sirens sound as rockets land deep inside Israel.  Slideshow 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Arizona Wednesday asked the U.S. Supreme Court to hear its appeal and overturn a ruling that put on hold key parts of the state's tough law cracking down on illegal immigrants.

The law, signed by Republican Governor Jan Brewer in April 2010, requires police to check the immigration status of anyone they detained and suspected was in the country illegally.

A federal judge blocked that provision and other key parts just before the law was to take effect in July last year. A U.S. appeals court upheld that ruling, prompting the state's appeal to the Supreme Court.

Other provisions put on hold require immigrants to carry their papers at all times and ban people without proper documents from soliciting for work in public places.

"I am hopeful that the U.S. Supreme Court will choose to take this case and issue much-needed clarity for states such as Arizona that are grappling with the significant human and financial costs of illegal immigration," Brewer said in a statement.

The Obama administration had sued, challenging the law on the grounds it improperly interfered with the federal immigration system. The judge and appeals courts agreed.

About 11 million illegal immigrants are believed to be in the United States. Immigration has become a major issue in states such as Arizona that border Mexico.

Opponents of the law, including President Barack Obama, many Democrats and civil rights groups have said it would lead to harassment of Hispanic-Americans. But supporters have said the federal government has failed to do enough to stop the flow of illegal immigrants into the country.

Obama has supported a comprehensive overhaul of immigration laws, but such legislation has gone nowhere in the Congress.

Brewer announced in May the state would appeal to the Supreme Court and the 41-page appeal was filed Wednesday.

Former Bush administration attorney Paul Clement said in the appeal that the case involved "a matter of pressing importance."

"It is widely recognized that the federal immigration laws are not adequately enforced," he wrote. "This broken system leaves the people and government of Arizona to bear a disproportionate share of the burden of a national problem."

The Obama administration is expected to oppose the appeal. The Supreme Court during its upcoming term that begins in October will decide whether to hear the case.

(Reporting by James Vicini, Editing by Christopher Wilson)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (2)
actnow wrote:
With 24 million underemployed and unemployed American citizens and a $17 trillion debt, shouldn’t Obama be trying to protect our jobs and limit tax payer liability by limiting illegal immigration? Obama, Durbin, Reid and Schumer have made it clear that their goal is to legalize 20 million unknown peoples (and eventually their families too) as a way a assure a single party welfare state, despite the great harm to our citizens. Only active involvement by our citizens can stop this scheme that they continue to push at every opportunity. Go to to see what you can do. This nightmare can be stopped if citizens care enough to get involved. Talk is not enough, political action is a must.

Aug 10, 2011 11:25pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
illegal immigration has destroyed many parts of the construction business, making them no longer a viable job to raise a family on. This is a direct result of our country’s lack of a tough enforcement of illegal immigration.
The fact that obama is wasting millions of tax payer dollars to defend illegals makes him a traitor.

Aug 11, 2011 10:38am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.