UK riots to cost over $323 million

LONDON Thu Aug 11, 2011 11:50am EDT

Related Topics

LONDON (Reuters) - Damage caused by riots in London and other British cities this week will cost more than 200 million pounds ($323 million), the Association of British Insurers said Thursday, doubling its previous claims estimate.

The increase came as British prime minister David Cameron said an 1886 law that allows insurers to pass on some of the cost of riot-related claims to the police will apply, with the government ready to make up any funding shortfall.

"The government will ensure the police have the funds they need to meet the cost of any legitimate claims," Cameron said in parliament, adding that the deadline for filing claims would be extended to 42 days from 14.

Under the Riots (Damages) Act, uninsured businesses and households, as well as insurers facing riot-related claims from their customers, can seek partial compensation from the police.

The legislation only covers property damage, with insurers retaining liability for business interruption costs, which can often exceed the cost of physical repairs.

Police forces typically take out insurance against claims under the Act, passing some of the costs back onto insurers.

RSA, Britain's biggest commercial insurer, said it would support the compensation scheme by making its claims and actuarial experts available.

(Reporting by Myles Neligan; editing by Paul Hoskins and Hans-Juergen Peters)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (1)
Tiu wrote:
Curious timing, the 1886 would have been enacted just in time for the Jubilee Plot of 1887, an infamous conspiracy to blow up Queen Victoria on her 75th anniversary. The police force was in its infancy.

Aug 12, 2011 2:23am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.