Analysis: Fight or flee: decision time for Libya's Gaddafi

ALGIERS Tue Aug 16, 2011 6:18am EDT

A rebel fighter, with ammunition wrapped around his neck, waits at a checkpoint in the coastal town of Zawiyah, 50 km (30 miles) west of Tripoli, August 14, 2011. REUTERS/Bob Strong

A rebel fighter, with ammunition wrapped around his neck, waits at a checkpoint in the coastal town of Zawiyah, 50 km (30 miles) west of Tripoli, August 14, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Bob Strong

Related Topics

ALGIERS Aug 16 (Reuters) - The battle to control Libya has entered its final phase when Muammar Gaddafi must make a choice: to seek a negotiated exit or to defend his capital to the last bullet.

Rebels with support from NATO warplanes have, over the past 48 hours, taken key towns around Gaddafi's stronghold in Tripoli in a dramatic series of advances which cut the city off from supplies of fuel and food.

Rebel offensives have, in the past, turned into headlong retreats. But if they hold their ground, the end of Gaddafi's 41-year rule will be closer than at any time since the conflict began six months ago.

A U.S. official said that for the first time in the conflict, government forces on Sunday fired a Scud missile -- an act that was pointless from a military point of view but signaled the desperation of pro-Gaddafi forces.

"The Libyan regime may or may not collapse forthwith but it now looks like it will happen sooner or later," said Daniel Korski, a fellow at the European Council for Foreign Relations.

He added: "The manner of its collapse, however, and the method of the rebel takeover will be just as important as the conduct of the war."

Flushed by their success in getting so close to Tripoli, some rank-and-file rebels on Monday spoke of attacking the capital next. But analysts said that will not be the favored option for rebel commanders.


Gaddafi will throw all the men and weapons he has left into a defense of the capital, civilian casualties in urban fighting will be high, and sections of the population in Tripoli are likely to oppose the rebels.

Even if Gaddafi's opponents were able to win that fight, the bloodshed would create grievances and vendettas which could make the capital -- and maybe even the country -- ungovernable.

"Any fight for Tripoli can be expected to be extremely bloody," said David Hartwell, North Africa and Middle East analyst at IHS Jane's, a defense and security consultancy,

"My guess is the strategy is to isolate the capital and start applying pressure ... They (the rebels) seem to be trying to cut the links to the capital, one assumes with the aim of not having to assault the capital."

But will that approach work? Encircling Tripoli and cutting off supplies could produce any one of three outcomes, or a combination of the three.

Starved of fuel and unable to bring in more weapons and reinforcements, elements of Gaddafi's security forces in Tripoli may decide the best way to save themselves is to lay down their arms or cross over and join the rebels.

Fractures in Gaddafi's security apparatus could be the signal for the second outcome: Gaddafi's underground opponents launch an uprising from within the city.

Representatives of the clandestine opposition have told Reuters they are waiting for the right moment to begin a revolt. Some of them have weapons.

It will take time though before Tripoli is ripe for an uprising, said Shashank Joshi, an analyst with the Royal United Services Institute in London.

"It is not on the edge of a cusp of falling and it's entirely possible that many people in Tripoli are not really aware of what has happened at Zawiyah. So it may not yet bring us to the tipping point."


The third possibility is that Gaddafi will decide to negotiate an exit deal. That would possibly involve him and his family going into exile in a state which will not hand him over for prosecution to the International Criminal Court.

People who know him say Gaddafi -- beneath his eccentric image -- is a pragmatist who will cut a deal if that is what it takes to save the lives of his family.

But they also say this will not happen until he is convinced he can no longer win. His spokesman on Sunday denied there were any negotiations on Gaddafi's departure.

"If he is going to try to strike a deal he will leave it until the last minute," said Hartwell of IHS Janes. "He still thinks he has something to fight for."

The worst case scenario for the rebels and their Western backers is that the strategy of strangling Gaddafi's capital will not dislodge him. In this event, there will be a battle for Tripoli and the only thing certain then is that there will be huge loss of life.

"It would not be surprising if Gaddafi were to go out with all guns blazing so long as no deal is on the table and he does not have an exit strategy," said Anthony Skinner, an analyst with risk advisory firm Maplecroft.

"The colonel may booby trap Tripoli and loyalists may also put up a fight to the death."

(Additional reporting by Peter Apps in London and David Brunnstrom in Brussels; Editing by Giles Elgood)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (4)
Eagle_Lion wrote:
Gadaffi a pragmatic?? he used to be, until he celebrated his 5th year in power, that is when he becomes more and more detached from reality..

He created a persona for himself, but inside him, he is a 1/2 paranoid 1/2 megalomaniac, he weights things not with logic, but with who to life and his ‘legendary” status as a world leader.. Thank God he did not become president of the U.S or worst, the USSR..

Large areas of Tripoli are opposing Gadaffi, but those he brought into Tripoli from areas that are more loyal to him (Sirt, Sabha, Bin Walid and Tarhona) they may fight for him.. but the majority of the Tripolitans are against Gadaffi and voiced that in 20th of Feb, but they have no arms, the crack down in Tripoli was so intense that rumers indicates 50,000 prisoners arrested during his brutal crack down..

Aug 16, 2011 6:49am EDT  --  Report as abuse
cris_PT wrote:
Eagle_Lion, if you are really a Libyan you should be ashamed of yourself and all the death and destruction caused to the Libyan people. This is no way to attain democracy. Most distressing is to see all these “Libyans” abroad supporting this intervention which is nothing more than an invasion of Libya. Incredibly, the most vocal are the ones who pay for NATO, Europeans and Americans, who have been tireless in denouncing this “humanitarian mission” as nothing more than a poorly thought-out plan to take and steal the future of Libya, and causing countless deaths and destruction of the country.

I don’t even hear of support for these NATO rebels in Benghazi. Let alone Tripoli.

Aug 16, 2011 8:51am EDT  --  Report as abuse
oxen wrote:
If those rebels and NATO attack Tripoli, there is little room left to talk. The Govt has to defend its positions in anyway it can. The UN mandate was blatantly abused by NATO as they support their puppets in TNC, all casualties are a responsibility of the puppet UN and the greed of NATO leaders especially UK/France and USA. There were better ways, but just because they have superior weapons they chose to use force to get a solution, that is not always the best solution. In this case it seems not to matter to the “west” since the casualties are not “westerners” and TNC was blood thirsty enough to encourage only the war option. Cease fire has to be respected by both sides, you cant help one side and ask the other to cease fire or flee, that is out right evil leadership. UN has lost its more legitimacy,authority and cohesion from this situation

Aug 16, 2011 2:44pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.