Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Best of Cannes

Style and scenes from the Cannes Film Festival.  Slideshow 

Photo

Ethiopia's salt trails

For centuries merchants have traveled to Ethiopia to collect salt from the surface of the vast desert basin.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Samsung Galaxy tablet ban lifted in most of Europe

An employee of South Korean mobile carrier KT holds a Samsung Electronics' Galaxy Tab 10.1 tablet (R) and Apple Inc's iPad tablet as he poses for photos at a registration desk at KT's headquarters in Seoul August 10, 2011. REUTERS/Jo Yong-Hak

An employee of South Korean mobile carrier KT holds a Samsung Electronics' Galaxy Tab 10.1 tablet (R) and Apple Inc's iPad tablet as he poses for photos at a registration desk at KT's headquarters in Seoul August 10, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Jo Yong-Hak

LONDON | Tue Aug 16, 2011 11:34am EDT

LONDON (Reuters) - Samsung can sell its latest iPad rival in most of Europe again after a German court lifted most of an injunction it had imposed at Apple's request.

The Duesseldorf regional court said it was questionable whether its authority extended to international companies operating outside Germany, so it restricted a preliminary ban imposed last week on Samsung Electronics to Germany.

Samsung's Galaxy Tab line of tablet computers is considered the most credible alternative to Apple's iPad, which has taken the market by storm, selling about 30 million since its launch a year and a half ago.

Apple and others have moved aggressively to defend their intellectual property in maturing markets, especially against Google's Android software platform, on which the new Samsung Galaxy 10.1 tablet is built.

Android, a latecomer to the mobile market, has become a target by rapidly turning into the world's most popular smartphone platform. Google is relatively defenseless because it owns few wireless patents, in contrast to older rivals.

On Monday, Google agreed to buy Motorola Mobility, the descendant company of cellular phone pioneer Motorola, for $12.5 billion, largely for its vast patent library.

The Duesseldorf court said its ban still applied to Germany, and also to the German unit of Samsung, Samsung GmbH, throughout the European Union. A hearing in the case was due next week.

Samsung said in a statement: "We look forward to the opportunity to reassert our intellectual property rights at the hearing scheduled on August 25."

(Reporting by Nicola Leske and Miyoung Kim)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
SeaWa wrote:
The Duesseldorf regional court said it was questionable whether its authority extended to international companies operating outside Germany,

Very Interesting point, I’d agree. However, the European Courts didn’t seem to have a problem fining the American Company “Microsoft” billions of Euros in anticompetitive fines. This court is not making a decision on directing foreign companies, they are merely determining what they can legally do on their soil.

Aug 16, 2011 11:46am EDT  --  Report as abuse
SueMe wrote:
How on earth people will mistakenly buy a Samsung Galaxy 10.1 thinking it is an iPad2? It defies all the logic. Dont you need to power it on or at least have a little bit of intelligence to check the brand? Only thick pocket but not very smart guys like the German judges and blind Apple supporters would buy any $500 rectangle plate with rounded corner thinking it is an iPad2.

Aug 16, 2011 12:41pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Geek_News wrote:
@SeaWa – the fines levied by the European Commission weren’t through courts rather through a government agency similar to the FTC. They have much broader power.

This case is an actual court case which was taken up in Germany alone and extended to include all EU contries. The judge questioned the courts authority to preside over the other EU countries that were also included in the injunction. Not specifically over a foreign company.

Aug 16, 2011 2:07pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.