Research explores potential outcomes of contact with aliens

Related Topics

BOSTON | Fri Aug 19, 2011 4:13pm EDT

BOSTON (Reuters) - Contact with extraterrestrials could be beneficial or might destroy the human race, according to an analysis of possible outcomes of an alien encounter that even one author of the study described as unlikely.

The scenarios are contained in a paper written by a trio of scientists dated in April and published in the journal Acta Astronautica that won media attention this week following an article published in a British newspaper.

The collection of possible outcomes, should earthlings meet beings from elsewhere, ranges from beneficial to harmful, according to the paper by Seth Baum, a doctoral candidate, and Jacob Haqq-Misra and Shawn Domagal-Goldman, both postdoctoral scholars.

Contact with extraterrestrials might lead to a discussion of math and science or helpful collaboration on solving serious issues like world hunger or poverty, the paper said.

In some of the more dire situations, the scientists said aliens could intentionally plan to eat or enslave people on earth.

Another possibility would be for extraterrestrials to destroy life on earth if they detected civilization was expanding too rapidly and could harm others. Evidence of humans destroying the environment could prompt such an attack.

Extraterrestrials could also harm earth through disease or by using technology, knowingly or unintentionally, they said.

The journal that published the study, Acta Astronautica, publishes articles on developments in space research. Baum is doing doctoral work at Pennsylvania State University, where Haqq-Misra is a post-doctoral research associate.

The other author, Domagal-Goldman, said in a blog post on Friday that while he believed contact with alien civilization was unlikely, researching the possibility was fun.

While there is still no detected form of extraterrestrial intelligence, the researchers said their review provided the groundwork for a more comprehensive plan to respond to alien contact should it ever occur.

(Reporting by Lauren Keiper, editing by Ellen Wulfhorst and Cynthia Johnston)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (11)
Phredator wrote:
So let me get this straight. This “scientific paper” speculates that aliens may believe that we will survive global warming, thrive, build starships, and expand our carbon footprint across the galaxy. And they just might contemplate wiping us out to prevent our polluting the universe?

Wow. This is what a “postdoctoral scholar” thinks up. Wow. And you PAID them for this paper? Wow.

Aug 19, 2011 5:05pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
treta wrote:
Phredator, If you are referring to Acta Astronautica paying for the article, academic journals do not pay authors for the opportunity to publish. If however, you are referring to PSU providing the research a grant, I’d agree it would be a bit ridiculous, but as the article quotes one of the authors, the research was ‘fun’. Most likely they did it in their own time, when their typical academic grunt-work allowed, and published under the affiliation of their associated institution. Not, ‘wow’.

Aug 19, 2011 7:27pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
candide08 wrote:
Outcome 1: We are food.

Outcome 2: They are much smarter than us and view us as we view cockroaches.

Outcome #3: They are much smarter than us and decide to help and educate us, we accept.

Outcome #4: They are much smarter than us and decide to help and educate us, we refuse, attack and they leave.

Outcome #5: They are much smarter than us and decide to help and educate us, we refuse, attack and they wipe us out.

Aug 20, 2011 11:06am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.