Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Flooding in India

Heavy monsoon rains have swollen several rivers.  Slideshow 

Photo

Celebrity portraits

Up close and personal with famous faces.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

No major heart risk seen in new psoriasis drugs

Related Topics

CHICAGO | Tue Aug 23, 2011 4:30pm EDT

CHICAGO (Reuters) - A new, highly effective class of psoriasis drugs did not appear to raise the risk of heart problems in a review of published studies, but the analysis may not have been big enough to detect rare cases, U.S. researchers said.

Abbott Laboratories pulled its U.S. and European marketing applications for one of the drugs in January, known as briakinumab [ID:nN14150334], due to concerns raised by U.S. regulators.

The drug is part of a new class of treatments known as anti-IL-12/23 agents that have been shown to be highly effective at treating psoriasis, an autoimmune disease marked by well-defined patches of red raised skin.

Patients with severe psoriasis are already at increased risk of heart attacks, and doctors are worried the new treatments may increase this risk.

Abbott's decision also raised concerns about Johnson & Johnson's Stelara or ustekinumb, the first drug in the class to win marketing approval.

"We're concerned about the apparent excess in cardiovascular events," said Caitriona Ryan of the Baylor Research Institute in Dallas, whose study appears in the Journal of the American Medical Association on Tuesday.

Ryan and colleagues analyzed data from 22 randomized clinical trials of anti-IL-12/23 and anti-TNF drugs to treat chronic plaque psoriasis, the most common form of psoriasis.

The older drugs block tumor necrosis factor-alpha or TNF-alpha, a protein involved in inflammation. The newer drugs targets two different inflammatory proteins -- interleukin 12 and interleukin 23.

Anti-TNF drugs in the study included Abbott's Humira or adalimumab, Pfizer's Enbrel or etanercept and Johnson & Johnson's Remicade or infliximab.

Ryan's team found that during the active portion of the clinical trials they reviewed, 10 out of the more than 3,179 patients who were treated with anti-IL-12/23 had a major cardiac event, such as a heart attack, stroke or death related to heart disease, compared with no heart problems in the 1,474 patients treated with a placebo.

Among patients treated with the older anti-TNF drugs, only 1 of the 3,858 patients had a major cardiac problem compared with 1 of the 1,812 patients treated with placebo.

Ryan told Reuters that although the study did not show a statistically significant increase in heart problems, it was likely not large enough to detect these rare events.

Dr. Christopher Ritchlin, a rheumatologist at the University of Rochester Medical Center, who has seen the findings but was not involved with the study, said the analysis does not ease his concerns about drugs in this class.

"There are some safety signals you are seeing in the treatment groups that are not in the placebo groups. I'm not saying there is a definite association, but there is smoke here," he said.

Ryan said the work exposes flaws in the design of clinical trials, which are powered to show differences in the effectiveness of drugs, but not to identify rare safety problems.

What is needed, she said, is some form of regulatory oversight of drugs after they win marketing approval, beyond the current system in which individual companies submit reports to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

"We have to find a way of being able to systematically gather safety data for these agents after they are on the market," Ryan said.

(Editing by Philip Barbara)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
SRSLY wrote:
Dr. Ryan and others like her combined with trial lawyers and an ever increasingly unreasonable FDA will be responsible pain and suffering of millions by putting drug companies out of business. If they do as Dr. Ryan suggests and design the flaws out of registration studies so that they can detect “rare” events, an already expensive proposition becomes prohibitively expensive. In other words they want drug companies (yes for profit companies, they are not charities) to spend billions of dollars to bring a drug to market that has zero-risk. That will never happen, no drug has zero risk and no drug ever will, this is a fantasy. This unreasonable thinking denies millions life saving and effective therapies because a study showed an insignificant elevation in risk of CV events. There has to be a reasonable risk benefit approach. Ask someone with disfiguring psoriasis if they are willing to take that risk.

Aug 24, 2011 8:42am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.