Strong East Coast quake highly unusual: scientist

WASHINGTON Tue Aug 23, 2011 5:44pm EDT

1 of 3. Office workers evacuated from buildings on Broadway in New York stand outside after a magnitude 5.9 earthquake that struck the US East Coast August 23, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Lucas Jackson

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The strong earthquake that rattled the eastern United States on Tuesday was highly unusual in its severity, though it was centered in a part of Virginia known for smaller quakes, seismologists said.

The initial earthquake, which registered a magnitude of 5.9 just before 2 p.m. EDT, was felt from the Carolinas to New England.

"One of this size is highly unusual," said Karen Fisher, a professor of seismology at Brown University and president-elect of the seismology section at the American Geophysical Union. "This is the largest earthquake by far that I am aware of occurring there in recent history."

The quake's epicenter in central Virginia is in an area the U.S. Geological Survey calls the Central Virginia Seismic Zone, Fisher said by phone from Providence, Rhode Island.

While the strength of the quake was unusual, the wide spread of the shock waves was common for the East Coast, according to Peggy Hellweg, a research seismologist at the Berkeley Seismological Laboratory in California.

This is largely due to the difference in the terrain, Hellweg said in a telephone interview.

"Our ground is all of this chopped-up stuff ... like a pile of marbles," Hellweg said of California's geology, which means that the waves from a quake don't spread out all that far.

In the Eastern United States, she said, "What you've got there is gorgeous bedrock and ... the waves propagate beautifully."

Another difference between the East and West U.S. coasts is that the West Coast is over the boundary between two active tectonic plates, the North American and the Pacific, and the force of these plates sliding against each other generates quakes regularly, Fisher said.

In the East, she said, "There's no driving engine in terms of the two plates sliding past each other ... so that's why it's much more unusual."

David Oppenheimer, a seismologist with the U.S. Geological Survey, said aftershocks should be expected for months.

"You'll feel magnitude 3 earthquakes over great distances ... I would expect tens of magnitude 3s for earthquakes of this size," Oppenheimer said from Menlo Park, California.

(Additional reporting by Mari Saito; Editing by Cynthia Osterman)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (19)
SarK0Y wrote:
maybe it’s sign to birth new Volcano.

Aug 23, 2011 6:35pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
toh wrote:
Really? Let’s see the last volcano to erupt in Virginia was 35 million years ago – Trimble Knoll. Maybe it is the mighty Mt. Mitchell at 6600 feet that is about to blow! Don’t mean to be so condescending, but when you live near Mt. Rainier (over 14,000 feet) and Mount St. Helens which did erupt in 2008 (over 8000 feet), it’s hard to take SarKoy seriously.

Aug 23, 2011 7:22pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
boy1 wrote:
maybe it’s nature that God created. This is not the first quake that we have experienced in tbe past few year.

Aug 23, 2011 7:29pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.