PayPal founder pays entrepreneurs to skip college

CHICAGO Wed Aug 24, 2011 12:00pm EDT

1 of 2. Dale Stephens, 19, the founder of, is seen in this undated handout photo. Stephens was chosen to participate in PayPal founder Peter Thiel's '20 Under 20' program that pays young entrepreneurs to skip college to work on their startups.

Credit: Reuters/HO/Ben Reyes

Related Topics

CHICAGO (Reuters) - Dale Stephens was homeschooled for most of his academic life, so when the 19-year-old was offered $100,000 to skip college and work on his startup, he jumped at the chance.

His decision was helped by the fact he had already dropped out of a post-secondary institution - Hendrix College in Conway, Arkansas - after just one semester to launch UnCollege (, a nonprofit that helps other teens educate themselves outside the conventional university system.

"I created my education, essentially hacked it by leveraging the resources of the world around me," said Stephens, who was homeschooled from grades six through 12 outside Davis, California. "You can do the same thing at the collegiate level."

Stephens, who started UnCollege last January and is also writing a book, is one of the young entrepreneurs selected to participate in the inaugural "20 Under 20" program created by PayPal founder Peter Thiel, now a prominent Silicon Valley venture capitalist.

Thiel, who runs the hedge fund Clarium Capital and is a managing partner in the VC firm The Founders Fund, in March introduced a program that lets self-starters like Stephens sidestep academics in favor of a hands-on approach.

"There are a lot of talented people for whom it makes sense to do something not entirely tracked," said Thiel, 43, who ironically earned both undergraduate and law degrees from Stanford University. "We wanted to encourage talented young people to explore some alternatives."

The 20 Under 20 initiative was born in part from Thiel's concern about the skyrocketing costs of higher education, as well as his belief that the status associated with some academic degrees has become more important than their educational underpinnings.

"It's unfortunate that we have this runaway credentialing process," said Thiel, who initially followed a conventional career path, pursuing jobs in law and on Wall Street before becoming an entrepreneur. In 1998, he co-founded online payments site PayPal, which was bought by eBay in 2002 for $1.5 billion. Thiel was also an early investor in the social networking site Facebook.

"When I look back, I was in this automatic default thing," he said of his academic choices. "Higher education, it becomes strangely this way that most people don't need to think about their lives - some sort of substitute for thinking about your future."


Thiel, who has argued the U.S. needs to jumpstart technology innovation and investment, is giving the two-year fellows annual stipends of $50,000 with no strings attached to help get their projects off the ground. Many are sharing housing in the Bay Area, creating ad hoc learning communities.

From biotechnology and robotics to energy and IT, their initiatives include pie-in-the-sky ideas as diverse as decentralizing banking in the developing world to improving motors for electric cars - even extracting minerals from asteroids.

Whether or not Thiel's program helps to transform these ideas into successful ventures, it has sparked a larger debate over the value of a college education in the world of entrepreneurship, which takes many of its cues from the school of hard knocks.

"The jury is out and I'm slightly skeptical," said Steve Blank, a former Silicon Valley entrepreneur who teaches at Stanford and the University of California, Berkeley, but doesn't think business schools do a particularly good job of prepping students for start-up careers.

"To generalize that this is great or bad is missing the argument," said Blank, a Vietnam veteran who dropped out of the University of Michigan just short of earning a degree. Since then he has co-founded numerous tech companies, including Web startup E.piphany, which he led to a successful IPO in 1999 before retiring. "After seeing how people learn, you can't generalize what is great for one group is great for another."


Thiel dismisses any criticism that the program encourages young people to take an easier path by forgoing college. He is quick to point out that the fellows, who were selected from more than 400 applicants, bring high levels of focus and determination.

"Dropping out has a whole connotation of dropping what you're doing and not doing anything," said Thiel, who prefers "stopping out." "We looked very hard at the motivational question."

Participants clearly require enthusiasm to make the most of what is arguably the greatest benefit of the program: access to more than 100 influential mentors from the ranks of West Coast tech entrepreneurs who are assisting with everything from business plans to networks that may lead to initial investment.

"They're absorbing everything fast," said mentor Barney Pell, a 43-year-old angel investor and founder of Powerset, a natural language search engine that was acquired by Microsoft. "They're young and they're raw, so there's a lot of stuff for them to learn, but they're learning machines."

Christopher Rueth, at 17 among the youngest of the fellows, fits the bill. Rueth's project began with the frustration he experienced in high school, where administrators placed restrictions on students' Internet use. He was eager to move to Palo Alto and get started on making the Internet more affordable to people throughout the world.

"In San Francisco I'm hoping to be hooked up with product development experts, product designers," he said. "A thing like the fellowship is good for the people who are ready for it."

For Stephens, Thiel's program offers an alternative to the expense and constraints of a traditional college degree.

"I've never been a conformist," he said, adding: "It's about bending the rules of the institution or the rules of society to meet your needs."

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (10)
moebadderman wrote:
It’s not about “conformity” and it’s not about money, or “rules”, or anything but whether or not you want to be an educated person. If you want to be a money-making moron, then fine, go ahead — but don’t pretend that you somehow occupy higher social ground than someone else who obtained their degree, because you don’t.

Aug 25, 2011 6:27am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Alfred.Brock wrote:
College has become a waste of time and money for most Americans. Many of the larger colleges rely on sports or government grants to stay in business – education is secondary at these locations. There are some good schools but the field is filled with ne’er’ do wells and professors (like Obama was and is) more interested in tenure than in teaching. Our elementary school system is broken and so is the system of ‘higher education’. Poorly educated and unprepared workers flood our markets and take white collar jobs they should not have with the results that you see around you in the American economy today. College has become something to be avoided rather than cherished as a family goal. No person in their right mind would put themselves in 20 years of debt (or their parents) to banks like Chase in order to get a diploma that proves to be worthless if the companies you apply for hire H1-B Visa workers whose education was provided by a foreign government for free or who received aid and grants from our own government in order to steal our jobs.

Aug 25, 2011 6:39am EDT  --  Report as abuse
paintcan wrote:
40 years ago the Vietnam War Draft flooded colleges and universities with millions of “scholars”. And during the 60′s and early 70′s a lot of them didn’t belong there. The economy was terrible most of those years – the era of stagflation, wage and price controls and recession so college was also a way to absorb youth. Only accredited colleges or universities were considered acceptable for deferment status. I think “deferment” really meant “indefinitely or until the big one”.

But if it hadn’t been for the war and the draft – conveniently absent today or the Wars in Afghanistan and Iraq would have been stopped cold, – I could have attended a night school in the profession I wanted to pursue since I “had to think about what to do with my life” and I would have tried to find part time or even full time employment in that profession during the day. I tested very highly in the professional aptitude test than on the SAT’s actually. But there was no room in the economy for a flood of boomers.

I am convinced that modern industrialized societies need and try to flush young men down the drain if they can. There are always too many of us and we are inconvenient newcomers in every labor maker. There is no draft today because it raises the uncomfortable prospect of flushing young women down the drain too.

The present depression is serving to make certain that the military career is an attractive option. The scramble to get into school is no longer cost effective. Not even online courses with unknown colleges and fly by night universities are effective when they are quoting one-year degree programs costing $26,000 to over $40,000 for tuition alone.

The most important thing about education is the ability to read and to know where to find information. The second most important is to net work but the 60′s weren’t much of a time for meaningful networking as far as I could tell. So many people wanted to forget their ‘hippie period’. There is more information online than I even saw in school – either in high school or college – and you don’t have to spend fortunes on dubious textbooks. But everybody can do it so it has no social cache. The reason to go to college today is to prove that your family either has money or you were so good at academics the school wants to pay for your education. The wealthier tend to be eliminated for scholarships by means testing and more academically and financially disadvantaged students get elevated. So what does the higher education prove?

But it is a catch-22. Employers want experience but experience is always difficult to acquire and the degree is required. But if you come from affluence and have good academic skills the bar is raised on you. so what does the present system prove.

The article doesn’t say anything about whether there are any requirements to create a ‘successful’ business. What if that money buys a lot of bankruptcies?

Aug 25, 2011 9:08am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.