"Abysmal" participation in cancer trials

Related Topics

NEW YORK | Fri Aug 26, 2011 6:57pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Very few patients who've had cancer surgery end up participating in clinical trials to test new treatments, researchers have found.

And those who do participate are younger and usually white, fueling concerns that new drugs may not fare as well once they hit the market because trial subjects don't match real-world users.

"Are you going to see the same benefits in the average patient?" mused Dr. Monika Krzyzanowska, a cancer researcher at Princess Margaret Hospital in Toronto, Canada.

"Are the risks in the clinical trial truly reflective of the risk in the general population if the enrolled patients are younger and healthier?" added Krzyzanowska, who wasn't involved in the new work.

To get a sense of how often cancer patients enroll in clinical trials, Dr. Waddah Al-Refaie of the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis and colleagues tapped into a California cancer registry.

Only 1,566 of nearly 245,000 patients -- or about six of every 1,000 -- had participated in a trial, according to the report in the Annals of Surgery.

"The rate is abysmally low," Krzyzanowska told Reuters Health.

Whether that's because few trials were available, or because patients are reluctant to join them, or something else isn't clear.

It's nothing new that clinical trials don't represent the average patients who may eventually end up using new drugs. For instance, fewer than one in 10 people with hay fever would be eligible to take part in the drug trials that end up dictating their care, French researchers said earlier this year.

The new findings are another illustration of the gap between real-world patients and those who participate in trials.

"Should we fix it? I think the answer is yes," said Krzyzanowska.

"What the solution is is a much harder question to answer."

While there is no universal answer as to whether it would make sense for a particular cancer patient to enroll in a trial, she added, "patients should inquire about what clinical trials are available and figure out if there is something available for them."

SOURCE: bit.ly/qlUXFh Annals of Surgery, September 2011.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
lbarrati wrote:
They need to do a study to find out why those 250K people didn’t participate. If they asked them to participate and they didn’t, and they admit they don’t know why they didn’t participate, how about asking them???

Aug 26, 2011 3:04pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
LaurelJ wrote:
I agree with Ibarrati in that as a cancer patient, trials were never even discussed. If the Oncologists and Physicians don’t discuss trials with patients, even if they never qualify for one, at least that opens the door to the possibility of trials to patients.

Patients actually receive closer observation while participating in a trial than if given standard treatment. The question is: should the patient approach the oncologist about some trial they’ve read about or should the oncologist have information readily available for his/her patients. I believe the latter is more likely. This is a communication problem, you don’t know what you don’t know!

Aug 29, 2011 10:21am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.