Romney says would not put limits on emissions

Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney speaks to employees during a visit to Stanley Elevators in Merrimack, New Hampshire August 16, 2011. REUTERS/Brian Snyder

Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney speaks to employees during a visit to Stanley Elevators in Merrimack, New Hampshire August 16, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Brian Snyder

LEBANON, New Hampshire | Fri Aug 26, 2011 11:59am EDT

LEBANON, New Hampshire (Reuters) - Presidential candidate Mitt Romney, in danger of losing his 2012 Republican primary front-runner status, on Wednesday he would not place restrictions on carbon emissions if elected.

Romney, the former Massachusetts governor, also said he does not know if human activity is the primary cause of climate change and does not favor spending heavily on climate solutions.

Asked about global warming at a town hall meeting in Lebanon, New Hampshire, Romney said he believed the world is getting hotter and humans contribute in some way to the change -- but could not judge to what extent.

"Do I think the world's getting hotter? Yeah, I don't know that but I think that it is," he said. "I don't know if it's mostly caused by humans."

"What I'm not willing to do is spend trillions of dollars on something I don't know the answer to."

In June, a day after launching his second bid for the White House, Romney caused a stir by saying he thought humans had contributed to climate change to some extent.

At that time he made a call for a reduction of "emissions of pollutants and greenhouse gases that might be significant contributors" to climate change -- a suggestion that was not made on Wednesday.

A Romney aide said the candidate has not altered his position on climate change.

A study by the National Academy of Sciences in 2010 found that "climate change is occurring, is caused largely by human activities and poses significant risks." That view is backed by most climate scientists. But surveys have shown that many Republicans do not agree -- especially those who are more likely to vote in the primary elections.

Two polls on Wednesday showed Romney, a narrow front-runner in the Republican field for much of the year, has lost the lead in the Republican nominating contest, trailing Rick Perry by double digits. The Texas governor recently jumped into the race.

Campaigning in New Hampshire last week, Perry, who is typically more of a social conservative, called climate change a "theory that still has not been proven" and labeled the science behind it "politicized."

Romney also said on Wednesday that he would make weaning the United States from imported energy from the Middle East a priority over reducing carbon emissions.

Still, using additional domestic nuclear, natural gas, and other resources could have a side benefit of cutting carbon emissions, Romney said. "My view is pursue a strategy which gets us into energy independence which has as a byproduct it gets us into less CO2 emitting."

He criticized a bill backed by President Barack Obama that would have capped carbon emissions and allowed polluters to buy and sell rights to emit carbon.

"I do not believe in cap and trade and I do not believe in putting a carbon tax" on polluting industries, Romney said. "I oppose those."

(Reporting by Jason McLure; editing by Ros Krasny and Bill Trott)

(Corrects quote in final paragraph of Aug 24 story to carbon tax from carbon cap)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (8)
giels wrote:
Romney doesn’t surprise me at all. Actually, I expected that line from him. After George Bush Jr and John McCain, voting for a Republican is like putting a down payment on the “business a usual” denial policy of US energy use. I was in Massachusetts while this man was in charge. You will be very sorry if he gets elected.
Will say anything to get into office.

Aug 26, 2011 9:35am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Pappy11 wrote:
Mitt Romney is by far the best Presidential choice we have had in this country in our life times including Ronald Reagan who I really liked.

He has been totally vetted and is the one candidate that Obama does not want to face. If Mitt ends up choosing Marco Rubio it will be one of the most balanced GOP tickets in history and will win in a complete landslide.

Rick Perry on the other hand has not been vetted and frankly the media has so much dirt on him that a train couldn’t pull it. They are largely holding their fire on Perry hoping very much that he gets the GOP nomination so they can completely destroy him and help Obama get reelected.

Nothing new here same strategy they used to get McCain the GOP nomination and then went after him in the general election. If you recall before the general election McCain was referred to as the media darling. Do not be gullible and fall for their schemes. Mitt Romney is the best and most qualified and brings the best resume to be a President in the history of our country.

Aug 26, 2011 12:47pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Eideard wrote:
Unlike some of the truly dimwitted that Romney is competing with to lead the Republican Confederacy – Romney is reasonably bright and his daddy bought him a decent education.

Therefore, he deserves even more than passing condemnation for leaping to the anti-science side of the road in his continuing effort to play on both sides.

Aug 26, 2011 1:04pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.