Rick Perry pledges to support traditional marriage

SAN ANTONIO Sun Aug 28, 2011 2:41pm EDT

Texas Governor Rick Perry (R-TX) prays during ''The Response,'' an event billed as a call to prayer for a nation in crisis, at Reliant stadium in Houston August 6, 2011. REUTERS/Richard Carson

Texas Governor Rick Perry (R-TX) prays during ''The Response,'' an event billed as a call to prayer for a nation in crisis, at Reliant stadium in Houston August 6, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Richard Carson

Related Topics

SAN ANTONIO (Reuters) -- Texas Governor and Republican presidential contender Rick Perry has signed a pledge vowing to support a Constitutional amendment declaring marriage to be a union of one man and one woman, the group sponsoring the pledge said on Friday.

"Kudos to Governor Rick Perry for making it clear: he's a marriage champion," National Organization for Marriage president Brian Brown said in a statement.

By signing the pledge, "Perry makes crystal clear that, contrary to the conventional wisdom, gay marriage is going to be even a bigger issue in 2012 than it was in 2008," Brown said, "because the difference between the GOP nominee and President (Barack) Obama is going to be large and clear."

The pledge also includes a vow to support the Defense of Marriage Act in court, appoint judges and an Attorney General who will respect "the original meaning of the Constitution," and appoint a presidential commission to investigate harassment of "traditional marriage" supporters.

Michelle Bachmann, Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum, among those competing with Perry for Republican presidential nomination, have also signed the pledge, the group said.

Perry's move was immediately attacked by Democrats and supporters of gay marriage in his home state.

"I'm afraid that this kind of thing is going to be required by the electorate of the Republican Party to win their nomination," said Matt Glazer, executive director of Progress Texas, a lobbying group for liberal causes. "But this pledge will kill him with independent voters."

Glazer said Perry promised in his August 13 speech in South Carolina announcing his candidacy "to make Washington, D.C., as insignificant in our lives as possible."

"He says he wants to make sure that the federal government isn't involved in much, and then he promotes amazingly invasive federal government policies like this," Glazer said.

Perry had previously appeared to endorse the idea that under the Constitution it should be up to individual states to decide marriage issues.

He later backed away from that comment after criticism from Republican activists.

Brown said his group's stance on marriage "is a winning position for a presidential candidate."

(Editing by Jerry Norton and Todd Eastham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (20)
lnardozi wrote:
Let’s talk about something a little more important, Mr. Perry. What will you do the day you get into office SPECIFICALLY to trim a half trillion or a trillion from our budget? Don’t tell me the Executive has no power in that respect – there are plenty of expenditures the President can choose not to make. In particular, another candidate, Ron Paul has promised to bring home all our troops and spend that money here at home. Are YOU willing to make that commitment? If not, why not? Well, let’s hear it – you want to report on something, report on Perry’s answer to my question.

Aug 28, 2011 3:40pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
I support traditional marriage too. I also support same-sex marriage.

Aug 28, 2011 3:45pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
jallard wrote:
Perry doesn’t know right from left: And, I mean that literally.

Aug 28, 2011 3:46pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.