Judge blocks Alabama immigration law to buy time

BIRMINGHAM, Ala Mon Aug 29, 2011 5:37pm EDT

Related Topics

BIRMINGHAM, Ala (Reuters) - A federal judge on Monday blocked Alabama's tough new immigration law from taking effect this week, making it the latest U.S. state to have a measure on illegal immigration halted in court.

Chief U.S. District Judge Sharon Lovelace Blackburn cited the need for more time to consider the legal challenges against the law in an injunction that blocks implementation of the law through September 29.

"In entering this order the court specifically notes that it is in no way addressing the merits of the motions," the judge wrote in her two-page order.

Federal judges have previously blocked key parts of other immigration laws passed in Georgia, Arizona, Utah and Indiana.

The Alabama law, widely seen as the toughest state measure on illegal immigration, requires police to detain people they suspect of being in the United States illegally if they cannot produce proper documentation when stopped for any reason.

The law also makes it a crime to knowingly transport or harbor an illegal immigrant, and requires public schools to determine, by reviewing birth certificates or sworn affidavits, the legal residency status of students upon enrollment.

Lawyers for the Obama administration and other groups asked the judge last week to halt the law, which was set to take effect this Thursday.

The administration argued that the U.S. Constitution bars states from adopting their own immigration regime that interferes with the federal system. Other opponents say the law will deter children in immigrant families from enrolling in school and criminalize Alabama residents who interact with those in the country without documents.

Conservatives have complained that President Barack Obama has failed to sufficiently stem the flow of illegal immigrants into the United States. The Obama administration successfully sued to block Arizona's tough law last year.

Attempts to overhaul federal immigration policy have gone nowhere in the U.S. Congress.

(Writing by Colleen Jenkins; Editing by Jerry Norton and Cynthia Johnston)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
P_Rathbun_III wrote:
A Federal issue mandates a Federal law to remedy/address. When this law ultimately goes down the drain (and it will), don’t blame the judge.

Aug 29, 2011 6:00pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
IrateNate wrote:
Oh, come on – we all know the order came from the White House. Good to see Obama’s Justice Department working overtime, trying to hold up any and all new laws dealing with immigration, in hopes of panering to the Hispanic community and his dying hope of reelection in 2012.

One has to wonder how our economy might fare today had this much effort been put towards actually doing something besides the same old empty promises of the same old Keynesian foolishness?

Aug 29, 2011 6:01pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
DRick wrote:
So, what is the PROBLEM this judge is having with ENFORCING THE LAW ! How long has she been a judge,,, 5 seconds. The Law is THE LAW and you can’t pick and choose what you are going to enforce. An Illegal is an illegal is an illegal. No amount and HAND WRINGING is going to make it go away. Grow a pair and do your F%$#@% job for which you are obviously paid WAY TOO MUCH !

Aug 29, 2011 6:20pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Pictures