Porn film shoots voluntarily halted after HIV case
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Pornography film shoots across the United States have been largely shut down after an industry trade group called for a moratorium because an adult-film performer tested positive for HIV, officials with the organization said on Tuesday.
The temporary moratorium recommended by the Los Angeles-based Free Speech Coalition comes as public health advocates escalated calls for greater enforcement of laws requiring porn stars to wear condoms on the set.
The Free Speech Coalition said it learned on Saturday that a porn film performer who has not been publicly identified had initially tested positive for HIV. It called for an industrywide moratorium on Sunday.
The performer received a preliminary positive result for HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, at a health facility outside of California. The San Fernando Valley suburb of Los Angeles has long been a leading hub of the porn industry.
Further diagnostic testing was needed to confirm the performer was HIV positive, the trade group said.
Diane Duke, executive director of the trade group, said she believed porn productions had largely been shut down nationally as a result of the moratorium, and that she was unaware of any companies that were refusing to comply.
"The industry has had a successful system of health and safety self-regulation since 1998, despite any misinformation being spread by our opponents," the Free Speech Coalition said in a statement.
In 2010, another porn performer, Derrick Burts, tested positive for HIV, which also prompted a temporary shutdown of porn productions.
A number of other porn stars have been infected with HIV over the years, said Brian Chase, assistant general counsel for the AIDS Healthcare Foundation, which was organizing a petition drive for a Los Angeles municipal ballot initiative to require porn performers in the city to wear condoms on set.
Supporters said local authorities were best suited to enforce such a measure.
California law and federal workplace safety rules require the use of condoms for porn stars exchanging bodily fluids through sex, but the industry has largely ignored those mandates, Chase said.
Porn companies have resisted efforts to compel condom usage by arguing it would force productions to go underground or outside the United States, increasing health risks.
The porn industry continues to operate in a legal gray zone, Chase said. "When you've got a situation like that, you've got a lot of industry participants who feel they don't need to follow the law," he said.
Until recently, many porn performers had been regularly tested for HIV at a private clinic in Los Angeles run by a private outfit called AIM Medical Associates. But the clinic closed in May as it filed for bankruptcy and dealt with lawsuits against it.
Since the closure, the Free Speech Coalition has developed a health and safety program to take its place, and it was in the process of signing up performers, producers and agents to participate, the trade group said.
(Editing by Steve Gorman and Cynthia Johnston)
- Tweet this
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Reprints
“Porn stars” are glorified prostitutes, morally and often psychologically bankrupt individuals. Often stemming from broken/abusive families and illegal substance abuse.
For all those that think differently imagine for a moment your son/daughter, mother/father, sister/brother doing a porn shoot.
When the person is that close to home, it suddenly stops being a lowbrow chuckle or a subject and becomes an full blown “what the hell are you doing?” moment doesn’t it?
Followed by the question: “how could you?”
By the way my thinking isn’t due to a broken/abusive family or illegal substance abuse, it’s just a matter of respecting a persons right to live life as they see fit. I don’t have to agree, or like that choice, but I must respect it as long as it isn’t illegal.
It also appears that the industry acts very responsibly overall regarding matters like this. Given the amount of porn made each year and the number of performers it would seem that a far larger number of persons would test positive were it not for how those invovled conduct business.
As with many things, just because it’s legal doesn’t make it right.
In a free society, respect for other’s rights is often a double-edged sword.
When you get past the invented flashy fantasy/erotic personas and look directly in their eyes seeing them as a human being and not an object of sexual desire or fantasy, there is always that feeling that something is not quite right with them.
Personally, I can not get anything out of pornography because what I see are broken people at the lowest in their lives…and perhaps I developed my viewpoint by speaking and getting to know too many involved in the sex trade. So my comments are not based on speculation or any kind of personal moral rigidity.
As for the industry “acting responsibly”…of course. They have to keep them healthy…who wants an AIDS afflicted porn star? The ones behind the camera keep the industry going and any semblance of “care” is just superficial. You can no more care for those you exploit than a pimp can care for his girls/boys he “supervises.”
It’s all bad, and all the money in the world can not make up for the loss of dignity and self respect.


Follow Reuters