General Petraeus hangs up uniform, warns on budget

WASHINGTON Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:50pm EDT

U.S. General David Petraeus gestures during the Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on his nomination to be director of the Central Intelligence Agency on Capitol Hill in Washington June 23, 2011. REUTERS/Yuri Gripas

U.S. General David Petraeus gestures during the Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on his nomination to be director of the Central Intelligence Agency on Capitol Hill in Washington June 23, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Yuri Gripas

Related Video

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - General David Petraeus warned against sacrificing U.S. military capabilities to ease America's budget woes, as he retired from the Army on Wednesday ahead of becoming CIA director.

Petraeus, 58, rose through the ranks to become arguably the U.S. military's brightest star, credited for helping to turn around the Iraq war and for helping to halt the momentum of Taliban militants in Afghanistan. He led U.S. troops in both conflicts and briefly oversaw the entire the region as head of the U.S. military's Central Command.

"Dave has, over the last decade, advised two Presidents, changed the course of two wars, transformed our military, and perhaps most important of all, reminded Americans once again, that with the right ideas and the right leadership, almost anything is possible," Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said at the retirement ceremony.

Mullen added: "Afghanistan is now a more secure and hopeful place than a year ago."

At the CIA, Petraeus will replace Leon Panetta, who became U.S. defense secretary. He will be sworn in on September 6.

Petraeus acknowledged he was leaving the U.S. military at a delicate moment, as the Pentagon seeks ways to cut some $350 billion over the next decade. Some lawmakers want even deeper cuts, which top brass warn will affect missions the military can carry out.

"As our nation contemplates difficult budget decisions, I know that our leaders will remember that our people, our men and women in uniform are our military," Petraeus said, adding that "taking care of them and their families must be our paramount objective."

He also warned it was important to maintain the "versatility and flexibility" developed during the past decade of counter-insurgency conflicts.

Petraeus said that the September 11, 2001 attacks, which triggered a decade of war, were a reminder that "we don't always get to fight the wars for which we are most prepared, or most inclined."

"Given that reality, we will need to maintain the full-spectrum capability that we have developed over this last decade of conflict in Iraq, Afghanistan or elsewhere," he said.

Petraeus' decision to retire from the Army is meant to ease the transition as CIA director, although the lines between U.S. military and covert CIA operations have blurred in recent years in the battle against al Qaeda.

As intelligence chief, Petraeus is expected to embrace the CIA's covert drone strikes in Pakistan, which U.S. officials say killed al Qaeda's No. 2 on August 22.

Petraeus has also dismissed concerns he would be unable to provide objective intelligence advice on the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, after leading those campaigns.

(Reporting by Phil Stewart; Editing by Vicki Allen)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
mp3andy wrote:
He is the one who ran up the debt with his failed military operations,

when he knew Osama was already dead in 2002 from kidney failure

Aug 31, 2011 3:01pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Greenspan2 wrote:
Afghanistan can never have security and hopefulness imposed on it from outsiders while there is so much resistance within. The US lost its initial opportunity to make progress there with its ill planned and unjustifiable diversion into Iraq and is now overextended and merely throwing American lives and dollars down a black hole.

Aug 31, 2011 4:25pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
garilou wrote:
“Afghanistan is now a more secure and hopeful place than a year ago.”

I guess everything is relative.
And certainly not for women!

I see more hope possible for Iraq then for Afghanistan.

But General Petraeus given that he was not the one who chose to go to war in Iraq, did certainly better than those who preceded him.

I just wonder what this means:
“we don’t always get to fight the wars for which we are most prepared, or most inclined.”
To which wars are you prepared and inclined?
Is the “defense” department (or the “attack” department) preparing a new war?

Aug 31, 2011 4:56pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Pictures