Former WikiLeaks partners condemn document release

WASHINGTON, Sept 2 Fri Sep 2, 2011 11:17am EDT

Related Topics

WASHINGTON, Sept 2 (Reuters) - Five prominent news organizations which collaborated with WikiLeaks have condemned the website and its founder Julian Assange for making public uncensored copies of more than 250,000 U.S. diplomatic cables.

The Guardian of London, the New York Times, Der Spiegel magazine, Spain's El Pais and France's Le Monde issued a joint statement on Friday deploring WikiLeaks' decision to publish "unredacted State Department cables, which may put sources at risk."

In a message posted on its Twitter feed, which Assange is believed personally to control, WikiLeaks confirmed on Friday it had released "251,287 US embassy cables in searchable format."

Earlier this week, WikiLeaks issued a lengthy statement accusing a Guardian journalist and a former WikiLeaks spokesman of having "negligently" disclosed top secret passwords to a copy of the cable database which had been floating, unnoticed, around the Internet for months. [ID:nN1E77U29G]

For its part, the Guardian said that it "utterly rejects any suggestion that it is responsible for the release of the unedited cables."

New York Times editor Bill Keller told Reuters: "We've never kidded ourselves that we had any control over the behavior of WikiLeaks, and we have taken pains to keep the relationship arm's-length. ... It's sad that -- whether out of a craving for attention, or an absolutist doctrine of 'transparency,' or some more malign motive, I can't judge -- WikiLeaks has decided on this irresponsible course." (Reporting by Mark Hosenball; Editing by Vicki Allen)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (1)
Dumble wrote:
You don’t suppose those two Guardian blokes rushing to make hay from their tell all book who gave the password out for the file that has been in your face floating out there as “insurance” want to take any responsibility? I mean they can’t have not seen the file out in bit torrent land, takes about ten keystokes to find, only now you don’t need to because the decrypted file is out there for the same number of keystrokes. Inconvenient to the Department of State indeed, truth is often inconvenient.

Sep 02, 2011 12:15pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.