U.S. tries to stall Palestinian statehood bid: report

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Sat Sep 3, 2011 11:12pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Washington has launched an effort to avoid a clash stemming from plans by Palestinians to seek recognition as a state at the United Nations, The New York Times reported on Saturday, citing senior U.S. officials and foreign diplomats.

The Obama administration has introduced a plan to restart peace talks with Israel to try to convince Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to give up the bid to seek recognition at the annual meeting of leaders at the U.N. General Assembly, it said.

The administration has told Abbas it would veto any request made to the U.N. Security Council to make a Palestinian nation a new member, the Times said.

But it said Washington lacked support to block a vote by the Assembly to raise the status of the Palestinians to a nonvoter observer state from that of a nonvoting "entity," which could allow them to join many U.N. bodies, and pursue cases against Israel at the International Criminal Court.

Senior U.S. officials and foreign diplomats, whom the Times did not identify, said the administration wanted to avoid having to cast a veto as well as a General Assembly vote that would leave only the United States and a few other nations opposed to Palestinian nationhood.

"If you put the alternative out there, then you've suddenly just changed the circumstances and changed the dynamic," the newspaper quoted a senior administration official as saying on Thursday. "And that's what we're trying very much to do."

With peace talks with Israel frozen, the Palestinians have vowed to seek full U.N. membership for a state in the Gaza Strip and West Bank, with East Jerusalem as its capital.

The European Union has also tried to launch a resumption of peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians, amid deep divisions over the proposed bid for statehood.

The Times said that while some Obama administration officials were hopeful a compromise could be reached to avoid a vote, there were plans to limit the consequences if it took place, including efforts to ensure that Israel and the Palestinians keep cooperating on security in the West Bank and on Israel's borders.

(Writing by Eric Walsh; Editing by Peter Cooney)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
AKYork wrote:
How can the US possibly justify opposing (or worse, vetoing) Palestinian statehood? The US needs to think long and hard before it makes this mistake. Seriously, if the US opposes Palestinian statehood or vetoes it, anti-US sentiment throughout the world will rise significantly.

The US already pays a massive, MASSIVE price for its blanket support for Israel (including much of “the war on terror”). If Americans sometimes wonder why there’s so much anti-US sentiment in the world, just realize much of it stems from its blanket support for Israel – whatever it does – including flagrant violations of international law. I in no way dispute Israel’s right to exist and defend itself, but it has no right to invade every one of its neighbors, illegally occupy land, illegally build on occupied land, and the many other atrocities it commits. People throughout the world aren’t stupid – they can see the raw injustice Israel and its US backers perpetrate.

Recognition of Palestinian statehood is not a bargaining chip. Recognition of Palestinian statehood and a peace process are not mutually exclusive. Indeed, peace talks are more likely to succeed if there’s a level playing field. But there you have it, of course: Israel loves ‘process’. It can’t get enough of it and can string it out for decades so long as it never goes anywhere. Just peace negations should resolve around land-swaps of equal area based on the pre-1967 borders.

Sep 03, 2011 11:55pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
PrayForIsrael wrote:
A major step in the wrong direction.

Sep 03, 2011 11:58pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Tiu wrote:
Obama, and everyone else, knows “peace talks” never get any wherer.
It’s time to stop obeying every demand Israel makes.

Sep 04, 2011 5:22am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.