Sponsored Links

JPMorgan CEO says bank rules "anti-American": report

Related Topics

Jamie Dimon, CEO and chairman of JPMorgan Chase & Co., poses for a portrait in his office in New York, in this photo taken December 22, 2010. REUTERS/Lucas Jackson

Jamie Dimon, CEO and chairman of JPMorgan Chase & Co., poses for a portrait in his office in New York, in this photo taken December 22, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Lucas Jackson

LONDON | Mon Sep 12, 2011 8:57am EDT

LONDON (Reuters) - The United States should consider pulling out of the Basel group of global regulators, Jamie Dimon, chief executive of JPMorgan Chase, said in an interview with the Financial Times.

Dimon said he was supportive of forcing banks to have more capital but argued that moves to impose an additional charge on the largest global banks went too far, particularly for U.S. lenders.

He was quoted as describing new international bank capital rules as "anti-American".

"I'm very close to thinking the U.S. shouldn't be in Basel anymore. I would not have agreed to rules that are blatantly anti-American," he said in the interview.

"Our regulators should go there and say: 'If it's not in the interests of the U.S., we're not doing it'."

The Basel III capital rules are designed to increase the safety of the financial system by making banks build up risk-absorbent "core tier one" capital to at least 7 percent of risk-weighted assets. The biggest, including JPMorgan, have to reach 9.5 percent.

Dimon also criticised liquidity rules, arguing that regulations that viewed covered bonds as highly liquid but discounted government-backed, mortgage-backed securities in the United States were unfair.

He added that other details hit investment banking activity core to U.S. banks hardest because of the threat that Asian banks, in particular, could take U.S. market share due to the combination of U.S. domestic and global rules.

"I think any American president, secretary of Treasury, regulator or other leader would want strong, healthy global financial firms and not think that somehow we should give up that position in the world and that would be good for your country."

(Writing by Stephen Mangan; Editing by Dale Hudson)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (24)
tabinnorway wrote:
He must be joking. The only anti-American and anti-capitalist actions as it relates to banks lately is the absurd idea that when bankers make bad investments then government (and ultimately tax-payers) should pay.

Shove this leech in a cell somewhere dark where he can no longer get his grubby hands on my money.

Sep 12, 2011 6:36am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Intriped wrote:
He is among many crooks that do not want to shore up. He would rather indulge in US Bailouts.

Sep 12, 2011 6:40am EDT  --  Report as abuse
GSH10 wrote:
Where was Dimon when anti-American manufacturing legislation was passed? The banks loved globalization to extend their reach. You cannot have it both ways.

Sep 12, 2011 7:09am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.