Business leaders tell Congress to "go big" on deficit cuts

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Mon Sep 12, 2011 5:44pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Business leaders and former U.S. government officials on Monday urged a congressional committee tasked with slashing America's debt to "go big" and consider major reforms of government assistance programs as well as the tax code.

In a letter to the "super committee," nearly 60 executives and former Treasury officials spanning several administrations said they wanted to see large-scale cuts to stabilize the U.S. debt as a share of the economy.

"We urge you to 'go big,'" they wrote in a letter organized by the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget at the New America Foundation, a bipartisan research group.

"We believe that a go-big approach that goes well beyond the $1.5 trillion deficit reduction goal" should include "major reforms of entitlement programs and the tax code," they wrote.

The congressional "super committee" of six Republican and six Democratic lawmakers was formed as part of an August deal to raise the U.S. debt ceiling.

It met for the first time last week and must report by late November on ideas to save at least $1.2 trillion from federal budgets over 10 years. President Barack Obama will present his recommendations to the super committee next Monday.

The Democratic president initially said the panel's target should be closer to $1.5 trillion, and said on Thursday they would also need to cover his $447 billion jobs package with long-term cuts, bringing the total to $2 trillion or more.

Obama hopes that by identifying ways to trim budgets in the future, he will be able to boost short-term growth enough to bring down the 9.1 percent unemployment rate that is casting a shadow over his re-election prospects next year.

Republicans concerned about large and growing U.S. debt levels refused to raise the U.S. debt ceiling unless Obama agreed to cut spending. Their bitter dispute brought the United States to the edge of default and prompted a Standard & Poor's ratings downgrade.

The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, whose members include former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill, former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker and former Congressional Budget Office director Alice Rivlin, said last week that $1.5 trillion was not enough to put the U.S. budget on a sustainable path.

(Corrects name of New America Foundation committee in paragraph 3)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
USAPragmatist wrote:
Of course they want him to ‘go big’, this is their code for getting rid of sensible government regulation that benefit the general population, all in the name of making as much profit as possible.

Sep 12, 2011 10:50am EDT  --  Report as abuse
fromthecenter wrote:
Yes, lets go big. Lets lower the corporate tax rate and eliminate all the loopholes. Lets eliminate the bush tax cuts, lets end the wars, lets raise retirement age for SS and MEDICARE.

Sep 12, 2011 11:58am EDT  --  Report as abuse
doggydaddy wrote:
LOL…I came on here to say the same thing, USAPragmatist. You’re absolutely right. Naturally, wealthy business leaders feel that the bigger the cuts the better. Bigger cuts means less pressure to raise their taxes and smaller government to oversee their illegal activities, like their offshore corporate offices, stock price manipulation, and carte blanche to pollute freely.

They’re teaching Americans to think that the smaller the government, the better, just like they taught us that organized labor is bad, “Obamacare” had death panels, and that Obama has created most of the debt that we’re now burdened with. The truth is, the corporate plutocracy wants to replace government in our lives. To some degree we can hold government accountable. Not so for our corporate plutocracy. And to them we, the people, are completely dispensable. (And after a day or so this post will probably be censored by Reuters.)

Sep 12, 2011 12:11pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.