Arctic sea ice coverage second lowest on record: report

ANCHORAGE, Alaska Wed Sep 14, 2011 5:00pm EDT

A member of a team of Cambridge scientists trying to find out why Arctic sea ice is melting so fast, walks on some drift ice 500 miles (800 km) from the North Pole September 3, 2011. REUTERS/Stuart McDILL

A member of a team of Cambridge scientists trying to find out why Arctic sea ice is melting so fast, walks on some drift ice 500 miles (800 km) from the North Pole September 3, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Stuart McDILL

Related Topics

ANCHORAGE, Alaska (Reuters) - Sea-ice coverage across the Arctic Ocean has dwindled to its second-lowest level since satellite records started in 1979, according to the National Snow and Ice Data Center.

Areas of the Arctic with at least 15 percent sea-ice as of Saturday totaled 1.68 million square miles, slightly above the record-low of 1.61 million square miles recorded in 2007, the center said.

Yet to be determined is whether the reported sea-ice cover will be the lowest for the year. Annual minimums are usually reached around mid-September.

"We're getting close, but there's still the potential for further loss of ice," said Walt Meier, a research scientist at the Boulder, Colorado-based National Snow and Ice Data Center.

Ice coverage could diminish either through more melt or from winds or both, Meier said. However, some areas, including those near the North Pole, were showing signs of ice growth, he said.

"Probably there's a little bit of both going on - there's melting and refreezing," he said.

At least one other institution has reported that this year's Arctic ice coverage was the lowest on record. A report issued last week by the University of Bremen in Germany said sea-ice coverage on September 8 fell below the 2007 minimum.

The University of Bremen researchers use finer-resolution measurements that can better distinguish smaller areas of ice and open water, Meier said. But that university's methodology also has some drawbacks, he said.


Under either measurement, however, Arctic ice cover has diminished dramatically over recent decades. Saturday's coverage, as measured by the National Snow and Ice Data Center, was only about two-thirds the average coverage measured from 1979 to 2000.

Reduced sea ice is believed to have cascading impacts on climate in the circumpolar north and even lower latitudes.

According to an academic study released Tuesday by the U.S. Geological Survey, Yupik Eskimo residents in southwestern Alaska are living with some of those affects.

The study, published in the journal Human Organization, examined observations of elders and longtime hunters in two Lower Yukon River villages.

The residents detailed dramatic changes over the years in river-ice thickness, a public-safety risk because no roads connect villages in that part of Alaska, and residents in winter travel over river ice.

The residents also testified to changing ranges for several animals, particularly moose and beavers, changes in vegetation and concerns about reduced availability of driftwood that used to be pushed downstream by powerful currents of spring meltwater.

With river ice reduced, spring thaws are less powerful or dramatic than they were in the past, according to the Yupik residents interviewed for the study.

"Many climate change studies are conducted on a large scale, and there is a great deal of uncertainty regarding how climate change will impact specific regions," Nicole Herman-Mercer, a USGS social scientist and one of the study's authors, said in a statement.

"This study helps address that uncertainty and really understand climate change as a socioeconomic issue by talking directly to those with traditional and personal environmental knowledge."

(Editing by Dan Whitcomb and Cynthia Johnston)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (3)
BrianJohnson wrote:
“Saturday’s coverage, as measured by the National Snow and Ice Data Center, was only about two-thirds the average coverage measured from 1979 to 2000″

That is an extremely misleading statement. You can’t compare mid-September levels to the AVERAGE levels of other years… For all we know, the levels right now are only 2/3 of the average for the past year alone. A more meaningful comparison would be comparing the levels right now to other years in mid-september.

Sep 14, 2011 2:33pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Keophus wrote:
Record setting events for a weather phenomenon that has only been observed for approximately 30 years are to be expected. After all, after somewhere around 100 years of temperature recording in the US, record temperatures (both high and low) are relatively common for at least one day of the year.

It is highly unlikely that arctic ice will completely disappear in the near future. It is also extremely likely that clueless media types will fail to note the fact that their prognostications were incorrect.

Scientists who make straight line predictions from a statistically inadequate data set are roughly equivalent to someone predicting that the world will ignite next Tuesday because the temperature at noon today was 20 degrees warmer than it was at 6 AM.

Sep 14, 2011 5:12pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Marque wrote:
Hi Brian,
I’m pretty sure they are comparing levels right now to levels in other years in mid-september. They wouldn’t be that stupid.
And Keophus, I’m also pretty sure scientists know that is is warmer during the day than at night. They are comparing statistical averages for large regions and long term trends. This is not random chance.

Sep 14, 2011 6:35pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.


California's historic drought

With reservoirs at record lows, California is in the midst of the worst drought in decades.  Slideshow