Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Weird homes

Home is where the heart is, no matter what unusual form that home may take.  Slideshow 

Photo

The drone wars

The frontlines of America's covert drone program.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

HP execs misled investors before August stock crash: lawsuit

Related Topics

A man walks past the Hewlett Packard logo at its French headquarters in Issy le Moulineaux, western Paris, in this September 16, 2005 file photograph. REUTERS/Charles Platiau/Files

A man walks past the Hewlett Packard logo at its French headquarters in Issy le Moulineaux, western Paris, in this September 16, 2005 file photograph.

Credit: Reuters/Charles Platiau/Files

Thu Sep 15, 2011 6:03pm EDT

(Reuters) - Hewlett-Packard Co and top executives misled investors for months before unveiling a series of major decisions, such as the demise of the TouchPad, that hammered its shares, a shareholder alleged in a proposed class-action lawsuit filed this week.

Shareholder Richard Gammel accuses the world's largest technology company of concealing the fact that its existing business model was not working and that webOS -- the operating software it inherited after buying Palm -- was no longer central to its business model.

On August 18, the U.S. tech giant stunned Wall Street by saying it was considering a spinoff of the world's largest PC business, killing off webOS devices such as the TouchPad, and buying British software company Autonomy Corp for $12 billion.

Shares of the company plunged 20 percent the following day, marking their biggest single-day drop since the Black Monday stock market collapse of 1987.

The lawsuit, filed this week in U.S. District Court by Robbins Geller Rudman & Down, accuses HP executives including CEO Leo Apotheker and CFO Cathie Lesjak of misleading investors by making positive statements about the company's performance that later proved unfounded.

The lawsuit seeks to recover unspecified damages on behalf of any who bought into HP between November 22, 2010, and Aug 18 of this year, arguing that the lack of disclosure about potential issues means its shares were artificially inflated.

HP did not respond to requests for comment.

Lawsuits by shareholders seeking class-action status are common after major declines in stock prices. Investor ire against Apotheker has grown after a series of disappointments in quarterly results, capped by the August announcements. Some also say HP is overpaying for Autonomy.

(Reporting by Edwin Chan in Los Angeles, editing by Matthew Lewis)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
shadowL wrote:
Say it isn’t so. They didn’t pay income tax on most of the company’s income so why should they disclose the truth on company outlook

Sep 15, 2011 11:15pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
eachtohisown wrote:
The Market isn’t necessarily right, medium term. It’s always over-reacting up or down. No-one complains when a share price overshoots upward.
This is just Meat for Lawyers (please note: a central theme in the loss of direction in ancient Greece was a society that increasingly looked to sue for gain. The word Sycophant was originally someone who wormed his way in, to get information to strengthen a suit).

Sep 16, 2011 2:50am EDT  --  Report as abuse
socratesfoot wrote:
If I invested in Ford, I would be equally be upset if they sold off the entire automotive line to make nothing but car NAV’s and stereos. I imagine such an action would cause a similar hit to stock prices.

So in fairness, while I can understand HP having the right to do this without approval, I have to agree investors deserve to be upset at not being told. If HP purchased Palm with the intention of moving into the tablet market, the move was one that was consistent with HP being a PC distributor, and the investors where sold on the idea that this business was going pretty well and it was what HP does. They invested in a PC company, not a software company. I can see the expectation that a few months later investors would deserve to be told if this was no longer the case. It seems to me that this may not have been the case.

Sep 16, 2011 12:58pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.