U.S. warns Pakistan after suspected Haqqani attack

SAN FRANCISCO Thu Sep 15, 2011 6:43am EDT

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta listens to a question during his first news conference at the Pentagon in Washington, August 4, 2011. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta listens to a question during his first news conference at the Pentagon in Washington, August 4, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Jonathan Ernst

Related Topics

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Defense Secretary Leon Panetta warned Pakistan on Wednesday the United States would "do everything we can" to defend U.S. forces from Pakistan-based militants staging attacks in Afghanistan.

U.S. officials, including Panetta, suspect militants from the Haqqani network were behind Tuesday's rocket attack on the U.S. Embassy compound in Kabul, as well as a truck bomb last Saturday that wounded 77 American forces.

"Time and again we've urged the Pakistanis to exercise their influence over these kinds of attacks from the Haqqanis. And we have made very little progress in that area," Panetta told reporters flying with him to San Francisco.

He added, "I think the message they (the Pakistanis) need to know is: we're going to do everything we can to defend our forces."

Panetta, who was CIA director until July, has long pressed Islamabad to go after the Haqqanis, perhaps the most feared of the Taliban-allied insurgent factions fighting U.S.-led NATO and Afghan troops in Afghanistan.

He declined to answer questions about what steps the United States might take to defend U.S. forces. But Panetta said he was concerned about the Haqqanis' ability to attack American troops and then "escape back into what is a safe haven in Pakistan."

"And that's unacceptable," Panetta said.

The CIA has had success targeting militants in Pakistan using pilotless drones, and Navy SEALs killed al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden in May during a covert raid in Pakistan. Last month, Admiral Mike Mullen, the top U.S. military officer, cited progress curtailing Haqqani movements within Afghanistan.

"I'm not going to talk about how we're going to respond. I'll just let you know that we are not going to allow these kinds of attacks to go on," Panetta said.

Pakistan's Directorate of Inter-Services Intelligence, or ISI, has long been suspected of maintaining ties to the Haqqani network, cultivated during the 1980s when Jalaluddin Haqqani was a feared battlefield commander against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan.

While based in Pakistan's North Waziristan area on the Afghan border, Haqqani refrains from attacking the Pakistani state and is seen as a way to maintain Pakistani influence in any future political settlement in Afghanistan.

U.S. officials including Panetta have played down the significance of Tuesday's attack on Kabul's diplomatic enclave, which showered rockets on Western embassies in a dramatic show of insurgent strength.

It was the longest and most audacious militant attack on the Afghan capital in the decade since the Taliban was ousted from power and a stark reminder of insurgents' resources and reach as Western forces start to return home.

Panetta stressed the attacks themselves were repelled by Afghan forces and inflicted a limited number of casualties. The U.S. military has cited gains against the Taliban in the past year, particularly in southern Afghanistan.

"These kinds of attacks -- sporadic attacks and assassination attempts -- are more a reflection of the fact that they're losing their ability to be able to attack our forces on a broader scale," Panetta said.

(Editing by Peter Cooney)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
shk wrote:
This is a joke right? Just 3 weeks ago around 300 militants from Afghanistan (under U.S. control just to remind you) attacked Pakistani posts in Chitral and killed close to 40 people. http://www.dawn.com/2011/08/27/militants-from-afghanistan-attack-chitral-posts.html.
Eye witnesses even claim that the attack was backed by NATO http://www.dardistantimes.com/content/attack-chitral0-2scouts-backed-nato-local-residents23
And now U.S is accusing Pakistan of the same (and without any evidence of course). Got to love the irony here.

Sep 15, 2011 4:48am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Tiu wrote:
Did they send the warning via ambassador Husain Haqqani or direct to Islamabad?

Sep 15, 2011 5:40am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Pakistan should look forward to good ties w/U.S. over strained ones because of mutual and general interest.Strong ties benenfit the entire group,because of preventing tyranny from the block including India.Mutual interest is considerable a bettr position.Our mutual benefit is at stake.Purpose is our judgement that we act in roles that only this and root out the devils in our midst-not because they righteous;but a revolt from within.Like in mind:insepeperable.

Sep 17, 2011 5:19pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus