Many failed to heed Joplin tornado warnings, report says

Related News

A flag is seen on the foundation of a home in Joplin, Missouri August 17, 2011. REUTERS/Eric Thayer

A flag is seen on the foundation of a home in Joplin, Missouri August 17, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Eric Thayer

KANSAS CITY, Mo | Tue Sep 20, 2011 5:57pm EDT

KANSAS CITY, Mo (Reuters) - The deadly May 22 tornado in Joplin, Missouri caught many residents unprepared, partly because warnings issued that day were met with complacency and confusion, a federal report said on Tuesday.

"The vast majority of Joplin residents did not immediately take protective action upon receiving a first indication of risk, regardless of the source of the warning," a 40-page study by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said.

The EF-5 tornado, which hit shortly after 5:30 p.m. on a Sunday, killed 162 people and destroyed some 9,000 homes and other buildings as it tore through central Joplin.

Joplin officials sounded a series of sirens for about 20 minutes as a severe storm system moved in from the west. Meanwhile, the National Weather Service issued tornado warnings, broadcast over the radio, television and other media.

In Joplin, like some other cities, sirens are sounded when a tornado or storms with winds of 75 miles per hour are expected, the report said. They are not necessarily associated directly with a weather service warning, it said.

In interviews with nearly 100 survivors of the tornado, NOAA officials found that the perceived frequency of warning sirens that night and in previous storms caused people to become "desensitized or complacent to sirens" and to not take shelter.

"Instead, the majority of Joplin residents did not take protective action until processing additional credible confirmation of the threat," the report said. For example, people would see the darkening sky or turn on a television or radio to confirm the urgency of the situation.

The report recommends the weather service work with other agencies to develop a more effective warning system that coordinates sirens with other warning methods. The system should be easily understood by the public, the report recommends.

For instance, a non-routine warning is recommended to prompt people to take "immediate, life-saving action" when tornado or extremely severe weather is imminent.

The report recommends that current GPS technology and NOAA Weather Alerts be better employed.

"While the weather enterprise was generally successful in communicating the Joplin tornado threat in a timely manner, current communication and delivery mechanisms are not seamless and are somewhat antiquated," the report said.

NOAA said it was unclear how many lives could have been saved on May 22 if more people heeded warnings and took shelter more quickly. Fortunately, the tornado moved rather slowly, which assisted people who did respond to sirens and other warnings, the report said.

(Reporting and writing by Kevin Murphy; Editing by Mary Wisniewski and Cynthia Johnston)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
Eideard wrote:
Maybe folks figured the tornado would fall off the edge?

Sep 20, 2011 7:23pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Joplimotommy wrote:
I for one was directly in the path of the F5 in Joplin. I was actually travelling thru town when the siren sounded. The siren sounded for approx 2 minutes then stopped. The sky wasnt threatening looking or anything in my location so I thought the sirens were stopped for the cancellation of the warning. As I drove on west the situation changed rapidly as the wall of the storm approached with the tornado wrapped in rain you couldnt see it like you do on tv. My first indication it was bad as I raced away from it to seek cover was transformers blowing up just 1 to 2 blocks behind me. I raced to the local Walmart and ran inside to take cover . I barely made it to the rear of the store when the roof started coming off. I was able to throw myself to my knees and cover a three month old baby who was sitting in a car seat on the floor with his grandma. The store imploded around us and I was buried in heavy amounts of debris. I couldnt even move. It all happens so fast . Its not like katrina where you had a weeks notice. This was 15 to 20 minutes tops. I will know next time that just because the sirens stop doesnt mean all clear. The public needs better education on this.

Sep 27, 2011 1:22pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.