Senate rejects trade promotion authority for Obama

WASHINGTON Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:37pm EDT

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell listens to questions from reporters about the Senate's passage of debt ceiling legislation at the U.S. Capitol in Washington August 2, 2011. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell listens to questions from reporters about the Senate's passage of debt ceiling legislation at the U.S. Capitol in Washington August 2, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Jonathan Ernst

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Senate Democrats banded together on Tuesday to reject a Republican amendment that would give President Barack Obama "trade promotion authority" to negotiate new market-opening agreements.

Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell offered the measure because he said it was vital for U.S. job creation.

"Without trade promotion authority, there will be no other trade agreements. We all know that," McConnell said.

"And that's why I've been a strong advocate for granting this president the same trade promotion authority that every other president has enjoyed since 1974."

The measure failed on a vote of 55-45.

Obama has not asked for trade promotion authority, which expired in 2007 and also is known as "fast track" because it puts trade pacts on a quick path to congressional approval.

An administration official said Obama will seek the authority "at an appropriate time," but pursuing the measure now would slow down action on South Korea, Colombia and Panama trade deals expected to go to Congress in coming weeks.

Senator Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat who chairs the Senate Finance Committee subcommittee on trade, echoed that concern.

He said lawmakers needed more time to craft new negotiating objectives for the White House, rather than just renew the expired law through 2013 as McConnell proposed.

"There is a lot of interest on our side of the aisle in working on this issue, but I would urge colleagues to resist the McConnell amendment," Wyden said.

However, many Democrats are wary of any new trade deals whether Obama or a Republican is in the White House.

Senators have been debating whether to renew two expired trade programs in what business groups hope is a prelude to action on the South Korea, Panama and Colombia pacts.

One, the Generalized System of Preferences, waives duties on thousands of goods from developing countries. The other, Trade Adjustment Assistance, provides income and retraining assistance for workers who have lost their jobs because of foreign competition.

McConnell criticized Obama for insisting Trade Adjustment Assistance be approved before submitting the trade deals.

"Still, I and others have agreed to allow it so we can finally move ahead on these vital trade deals," he said. "And it's my expectation ... that the president will stop dragging his feet and soon submit all three of them for a quick approval."

(Reporting by Doug Palmer; editing by Christopher Wilson)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (3)
xyz2055 wrote:
Why do we continue to give these countries open access to our markets? Waiving any duties on the goods. Manufacturing in China is starting a downward spiral (recent news reports). Are American companies pushing the Republicans to make such deals so they can continue to seek the cheapest labor on the planet to make their products? Ross Perot was spot on with his “giant sucking sound”.

Sep 20, 2011 11:32pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
fromthecenter wrote:
Just look up trade balances the US has with the rest of the world, and tell me how many jobs this will bring back. This will generate some nice profits for the few, and more of the middle class will be eliminated. No wonder why the republicans keep pushing for more trade deals.

Sep 20, 2011 12:44am EDT  --  Report as abuse
The_Cat wrote:
Maybe Obama being denied trade promotion authority is a good thing. So far NAFTA and other trade pacts are not working so well for the American public or even the people of the countries they are made with.
The most recent agreements any of Obama’s people made was Hilda Solis, Secretary of Labor, who made agreements with most Central and South American nations about jobs.
The deal she made was not to create jobs for Americans. It was a promise that she would do all within her power to protect the jobs and incomes of their citizens who come to the US without permission.
With agreements like that being made, Americans really don’t need “help” through more of them.

Sep 21, 2011 2:49am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.