Senator Wyden: Repeal foreign profit tax break

U.S. Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor (R) and Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) talk to the media before their meeting on Capitol Hill in Washington June 3, 2009. REUTERS/Yuri Gripas

U.S. Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor (R) and Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) talk to the media before their meeting on Capitol Hill in Washington June 3, 2009.

Credit: Reuters/Yuri Gripas

WASHINGTON | Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:20pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The tax code may be headed for some major renovation, and Senator Ron Wyden, a rangy Oregon Democrat, has come up with one of Congress' most complete blueprints.

Among his recommendations are slashing the corporate income tax rate, repealing a law that lets companies put off paying taxes on overseas income, and allowing a tax holiday for repatriation of foreign profits, he said in an interview.

After 15 years in the Senate and 16 years previously in the House of Representatives, Wyden is under no illusions about the difficulties ahead, but he also offers insight that might defy the many skeptics about tax reform's prospects.

"Bill Bradley told me once that tax reform is always totally, completely and thoroughly impossible until 15 minutes before it comes together," Wyden said, referring to the former Democratic senator and professional basketball star who played a key role in the last major U.S. tax reform in 1986.

"At some point, people just see how dysfunctional the tax law really is," said Wyden, a Senate Finance Committee member and the No. 2 Democrat on the energy committee.

He acknowledged that the politics of reform are tough and that some lawmakers are already talking about the dual subjects of tax and spending as if they are 2012 campaign issues, but he added an urgent note.

"I personally don't believe the country can afford to wait another 14 months" until the November 2012 national elections for tax reform, he said. "The economic hurt is too great."

Wyden drafted legislation, first introduced in 2010, with now-retired Republican Senator Judd Gregg. Its main co-sponsor is Republican Senator Dan Coats. The Wyden-Coats bill has one other co-sponsor, Democratic Senator Mark Begich.

Its fiscal impact has been fully evaluated by congressional tax experts, unlike some competing tax reform bills.

While Wyden-Coats has still not gained wide support, some of its ideas have. The December 2010 Bowles-Simpson deficit commission's final report, commissioned by the Obama White House, was partly modeled on Wyden's bill.

FEWER BRACKETS

The bill would reduce the number of tax brackets, eliminate the Alternative Minimum Tax, nearly triple the standard tax deduction, and preserve popular deductions for mortgage interest and charitable donations, as well as tax credits for children and earned income.

It would eliminate the law that allows a corporation to defer paying taxes on profits made overseas as long as the money stays abroad. Because of this law, an estimated $1.5 trillion in foreign profits is parked overseas, avoiding U.S. taxes.

Wyden-Coats would grant large corporations a onetime repatriation tax holiday, letting them bring that money into the United States at a rock-bottom tax rate. By eliminating deferral, Wyden said, his bill would sharply reduce the corporate tax rate to 24 percent from 35 percent.

"We ought to take away some tax breaks for shipping jobs overseas, like deferral, which specifically allows American business to close in the United States, set up overseas and then pay no taxes to the American government until they bring that money back," Wyden said.

His bill's corporate rate of 24 percent is only one idea, he said. Other bills set different numbers, but the goal should be to "dramatically slash the rates."

"This would create a dramatic incentive for what I call red-white-and-blue jobs," he said. "If you have a competitive rate, you can get rid of some of the other complexities."

For example, corporate lobbyists are promoting territorial taxation, which would allow companies to pay income tax on profits only to the country in which they are earned, no longer to the United States when the profits are repatriated.

"I can just tell you that what concerns me about some of those ideas is that under some versions of it, you could still have a lot of gaming," Wyden said.

On the tax and spending proposals presented on Monday by President Barack Obama, Wyden said some of them "could be knit together as part of a bipartisan reform effort."

The United States needs ideas to expand the economy and create jobs, he said. "That, of course, is what tax reform is all about."

(Editing by Howard Goller and Lisa Von Ahn)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
Marla wrote:
“We ought to take away some tax breaks for shipping jobs overseas..” – It’s a start, but we should take away all of them if we want to promote the creation of jobs here! And “lower the corporate tax rate?” – Is he kidding? Corporations are making record profits right now, and already enjoying very low tax rates. That said, Wyden’s proposal is not all bad. He would preserve, and even increase some important tax breaks for us regular folks, and corporations that do business abroad would not be able to defer tax payments to the USA. this is a good jumping off place for tax reform and deserves a good, hard look and some NON-PARTISAN tweaking.

Sep 21, 2011 9:00am EDT  --  Report as abuse
QuietThinker wrote:
Changing the tax break for overseas profits isn’t just about taxes, it is about jobs as well. Right now those profits parked overseas can be used to build factories in other countries. I understand the value of keeping US corporations competitive internationally, the rationale for the tax break in the first place. However, I would kill the break for any US corporation whose social security payroll decreases. They would then be liable for taxation of all current year overseas profits as well as some large percentage of all previously protected profits. This would replace the current tax incentives for shipping jobs overseas with a penalty. Companies not shipping jobs overseas would not be harmed at all. I am glad some politicians are noticing the most important tax issue of all.

Sep 21, 2011 9:54am EDT  --  Report as abuse
John2244 wrote:
Politicians just don’t get it. Companies should not have to pay tax on foreign profits. That doesn’t make any sense because they operate as multinationals and pay tax in each country. The point is to help American companies be competitive. What companies should not do is use inter-company transfers to make US profit look like foreign profit. If you take company like GE Aircraft Engines, they basically make all their money abroad. They compete against Rolls Royce, if they have to pay extra US tax on every sale while the British multinational only pays in local jurisdictions – one of two things will happen – GE Engines will lose sales and be bought by a foreign company or GE will need to spinoff the division and move the headquarters to another country. You can say buy to several high paying salaries. There is no reason that true multi-nationals should pay US tax; just lower the US tax rate to what it is in most western countries and then companies will stop using loopholes to do income transfers.

Sep 21, 2011 10:02am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.