Verizon takes Samsung's side in spat with Apple

Mon Sep 26, 2011 12:29pm EDT

A sign of Verizon Wireless is seen at its store in Westminster, Colorado April 26, 2009. REUTERS/Rick Wilking

A sign of Verizon Wireless is seen at its store in Westminster, Colorado April 26, 2009.

Credit: Reuters/Rick Wilking

Related Topics

(Reuters) - Verizon Wireless, the biggest U.S. mobile provider, has taken a legal stand against Apple Inc's request to ban the sale of some Samsung Electronics Co devices in the United States.

Verizon Wireless said that an injunction would stunt adoption of its high-speed wireless service, which is dependent on consumers being able to buy devices from vendors such as Samsung, which run on its high-speed network.

Apple sued Samsung in California on April 15 asking for a ban of its devices in the United States. Verizon made its filing ahead of an October 13 hearing in the case.

"The requested injunction of certain Samsung products will harm Verizon Wireless and U.S. consumers," Verizon said in a court filing dated September 23.

"It also has the possibility of slowing the deployment of next-generation networks -- such as Verizon Wireless's -- contrary to the stated goals of the U.S. government," it said.

Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Other U.S. operators such as AT&T Inc, Sprint Nextel and T-Mobile USA did not immediately say whether they also plan to weigh in on the case.

Apple and Samsung have been locked in an acrimonious global battle over smartphone and tablet patents since April. Last month Apple won a symbolic legal victory when a German court upheld a ban on Samsung's local unit selling its Galaxy 10.1 tablets in Europe's biggest economy.

Verizon Wireless is a venture of Verizon Communications Inc and Vodafone Group Plc.

The U.S. case is Apple Inc v. Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd et al, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 11-1846.

For Apple: Morrison & Foerster; Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr; Taylor & Company Law Offices; Bridges & Mavrakakis. For Samsung: Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan.

For Verizon: Bergeson; Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel.

(Reporting by Tarmo Virki in Helsinki and Sinead Carew in New York, editing by Matthew Lewis)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
Eideard wrote:
My opinion of Samsung continues to plummet. Greedy buggers who have killed the goose…

Sep 26, 2011 2:45pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Rfpete wrote:
Its hard not to see this pro Samsung position by VZ as strong indication Apple has yet to commit to 4G on any device. So much for iPHONE 4G. What a shame, Apple has been superb and flawless in marketing except for their apparent inability to understand wireless. They’d forgo the only true 4G broadband wireless capability.

Sep 27, 2011 11:01am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.