New study downplays effects of lean manufacturing

Wed Sep 28, 2011 12:30pm EDT

A worker wheels rolls of cloth in Los Angeles, California June 30, 2011. REUTERS/Lucy Nicholson

A worker wheels rolls of cloth in Los Angeles, California June 30, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Lucy Nicholson

Related Topics

(Reuters) - Lean manufacturing principles, widely touted by companies as an effective way to eliminate waste and boost the bottom line, often do not achieve targeted cost savings, according to a study to be released on Wednesday.

Analysts at New York-based consulting firm AlixPartners LLP found that about 30 percent of companies surveyed achieved a 2010 goal of cutting at least 5 percent of manufacturing costs by employing lean practices such as those championed by Six Sigma, Kaizen or Value Stream Mapping.

Nearly half the 100 executives surveyed were targeting savings of 5 percent or more. The majority of executives reported savings in the 1 percent to 4 percent range, which AlixPartners views as being below the optimal range.

In addition, nearly 60 percent of the executives surveyed do not expect they can sustain at least half of the savings they did make over the long term.

The results of the study could raise eyebrows in a business community where several executives and managers consider themselves lean-manufacturing loyalists, clinging to their status as a Six Sigma Black Belt or a Kaizen master.

So-called lean principles have grown in popularity over the past four decades after companies including Toyota Motor Corp, General Electric Co and Motorola pointed to these programs as a key driver of continuous improvement, not just cost cutting.

"Most companies don't apply lean principles in a way that gives them the most potential bang for the buck," AlixPartners Managing Director Steve Maurer said in an interview.

Maurer said companies do not typically set aggressive enough targets, and lean programs are often viewed as a "checklist" of do's and don'ts in a narrow corner of the business rather than a broader way to run an entire company.

The firm did not disclose the names of the companies it surveyed but said they included an array of global manufacturing firms spanning the automotive, consumer products, industrial, aerospace and defense, and other sectors.


The survey, completed in June, comes at a critical time for American businesses. Facing the threat of increasing globalization, further economic uncertainty and more stringent regulations, many capital-intensive companies are taking a conservative approach to investing and hiring even though they are profitable and reporting positive cash flows.

Analysts who credit lean manufacturing philosophies for leading to significant change at small and large companies are quick to caution observers to not throw out the principles simply because some companies fail to properly implement them.

"Where lean programs are properly executed, long-term benefits to market share and profitability have been substantial," said Alex Blanton, Clear Harbor Asset Management senior analyst covering capital goods companies.

He said the trouble with a study like the one that AlixPartners did is that it may be viewed as too narrowly focusing on cost cuts as the predominant sign of success.

Blanton said Caterpillar Inc is a modern example of a company that has relied on lean manufacturing to overhaul the entire business culture.

"Long-term cultural change should be the No. 1 priority," he said. "I see that as the biggest reason the surveyed companies are not getting the results they expected or could be getting. And such change is essential if lean benefits are to be sustained."

Issues such as on-time delivery, quality and inventory reduction should also be key motivations, according to the AlixPartners study and Clear Harbor's Blanton.

(Reporting by John D. Stoll, editing by Matthew Lewis)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (1)
Madhawk wrote:
Well, well, well, won’t the Honeywell Aerospace people be upset with this. This just strenghtens the view I’ve had ever since starting empolyment at Honeywell.
The sad part of this is, the trend will continue until someone comes up with a new “buzz” word for manufacturing,(remember JIT?).
Until company managers get down to the manufacturing floor, (and push themselves away from the computer for an hour), and actually see,(and maybe even do!), what’s going on, “lean mgf.” will be just another buzz word destined for the scrap bin.
Most managers don’t even have a clue as to how much it even cost them to make a part, let alone where to focus their efforts on how to cut cost. They usually end up cutting cost in the wrong area.
Throw away your golden piece of paper you boys bought at some college that tells us all how smart you “trend setters” are and get your butt down on the shop floor and get the real picture.
To bad, because I’m a firm believer in Continous Improvement.
It’s to bad upper management “just don’t get it”.

Sep 28, 2011 1:40pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.