Four U.S. states may leapfrog Florida primary date

CHARLESTON, South Carolina Thu Sep 29, 2011 5:06pm EDT

Related Topics

CHARLESTON, South Carolina (Reuters) - Four U.S. states holding contests early in 2012 to choose the Republican presidential nominee threatened on Thursday to leapfrog Florida if it goes ahead with a primary election date of January 31.

Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina are the only four states permitted by the Republican National Committee (RNC) to hold primaries or caucuses earlier than March 6, the date dubbed "Super Tuesday" with contests in multiple states.

Florida's announcement on Wednesday that it wanted to hold its primary in January started a game of leapfrog among states to assert their influence in picking the nominee and to draw millions of dollars in candidate spending.

As it currently stands, the Iowa caucuses are set for February 6, the New Hampshire primary for February 14, the Nevada caucuses for February 18 and the South Carolina primary for February 28.

Iowa Republican Party Chairman Matt Strawn issued a statement indicating the four states' plan to stick together in their efforts to keep their early contest spots.

"The four sanctioned, early states have been very clear that we will move together, if necessary, to ensure order as outlined in RNC rules. If we are forced to change our dates together, we will," Strawn said.

Florida must make its January date official before South Carolina will move up its primary and face the penalty of losing delegate votes at the Republican National Convention in Tampa, Florida in August, according to South Carolina Republican Party Chairman Chad Connelly.

"If Florida wants to be the bad boy, I am going to make them make us move," Connelly said on Thursday from the state capital of Columbia.

"I'm going to have a hissy fit at the RNC meeting in January if they make us accept penalties that other states have forced us into. It's inherently unfair."

Florida has said it will officially announce its date on Friday. The deadline for states to set their primaries is Saturday.

The chaos in the Republican presidential primary calendar could push Iowa's first-in-the-nation caucuses to January 2, said political scientist Larry Sabato, director of the University of Virginia's Center for Politics.

"It's ridiculous," Sabato said. "It's turning the election into the grinch that stole Christmas. Everybody's had their Christmas wiped out. It's no wonder people get sick of politics."

In the process of choosing the presidential nominees fielded by the two major U.S. political parties, candidates compete in primary elections or other contests in the states to win delegates who ultimately will pick the nominees in later party conventions.

There will be no Democratic primaries because President Barack Obama is unopposed for the party's nomination.

The Republican nominee is due to face Obama in the November 6, 2012, general election.

(Editing by Will Dunham)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (24)
Otakudojo wrote:
The GOP knows it needs to skip iowa in the primaries because Ron Paul will win overwhelmingly and will set the president. The New World Order hates Ron Paul and will do anything they can to suppress him.

Ron Paul WILL PREVAIL!

Sep 29, 2011 4:11pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
RMagnus wrote:
Why should Iowa and New Hampshire choose the rest of the country’s candidate? The entire process needs to be revamped. Do either a few “Super Tuesdays,” or simply split the primaries into equal blocs. Moreover, these are Republican primaries. All of them should be decided by registered Republican voters, not Democrats or Independents. That’s how we got we got such a weak-tit the last time.

Sep 29, 2011 4:22pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
JessicaJames wrote:
Ron Paul 2012! Ron Paul will defeat Obama!

Sep 29, 2011 4:24pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.