Sponsored Links

Lockheed to offer F-35 work to Japan firms to win bid

TOKYO | Thu Oct 6, 2011 6:54am EDT

TOKYO (Reuters) - U.S. aerospace and defense contractor Lockheed Martin (LMT.N) said on Thursday it will offer final assembly of the F-35 fighter to Japanese firms in a bid for a defense contract from Tokyo.

Lockheed, seeking to bolster its chances of winning a bid to supply warplanes worth as much as $8 billion to Japan, said it will also offer manufacture of major components, maintenance work and engine assembly of the F-35 to Japanese firms.

The F-35 "has taken our industry and partners to a new level," John Balderston, the campaign director for Lockheed's bid, told reporters at a Tokyo hotel where the company was displaying a mockup of the plane.

"It will put Japanese aerospace into the lead," Balderston said, referring to what Lockheed says is its more advanced technology than rivals.

Lockheed's F-35 Joint Strike Fighter is competing for an order to replace aging F-4 Phantom fighters in Japan against Boeing's (BA.N) F/A 18 Super Hornet and the Typhoon, made by a consortium of European firms including EADS (EAD.PA), Britain's BAE Systems (BAES.L) and Italy's Finmeccanica (SIFI.MI).

Japan rarely buys European equipment, preferring to arm its military with U.S. or Japan designed weapons, and the 40-plane order is expected to go to either Lockheed or Boeing.

While the newer design of Lockheed's F-35 has an edge in stealth technology, cost overruns and schedule slips have cast doubts over its prospects.

The Pentagon said on Wednesday it expects to finish a "should cost" estimate for the next batch of F-35s this month.

Officials estimate it will cost $382 billion to build 2,447 of the jets for the U.S. military, but Pentagon chief arms buyer Ashton Carter has pledged to push that down to a far lower "should cost" level.

American arms makers have typically farmed out much of the production to Japanese companies, including Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (7011.T), Kawasaki Heavy Industries (7012.T) and IHI (7013.T) as part of past agreements to supply equipment to Japan's army, navy and air force.

Boeing executive Phillip Mills told Reuters last month that local defense contractors could build three-quarters of the Super Hornet's components under license if Japan picked the aircraft.

(Reporting by Tim Kelly; Editing by Michael Watson)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
jo5319 wrote:
What aren’t we keeping these jobs in America?
Japanese labor isn’t cheap.
These are good jobs that we should not export.

These are the companies that Obama should be breathing down on.

Oct 08, 2011 7:05pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Real logical!

Our Federal government gives money to provide for Japanese jobs
with our tax money by contracting with private firms.
The Fed should should stipulate that the assembly jobs must stay in America.

Meanwhile, more money is going to be dumped in jobs and stimulus bills which end up mostly in waste, barely saving some jobs that would have been cut!

How come this is not on the front page of Reuters so that more Americans can call their congressmen and senators to ask them act quickly and create/keep these jobs at home.

Oct 08, 2011 7:11pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Janeallen wrote:
Could it be that Japan just wants an “in” on our technology?

They’re our “allies” now, but they were supposed to be our friends until they sneaked in the Pearl Harbor attack without declaring war.
And we’re trusting them?!

We do not lack corporate gains in America. What we lack are jobs.

Oct 08, 2011 7:15pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.