Treasury complained about Solyndra decisions-emails

Fri Oct 7, 2011 7:58pm EDT

* Treasury Dept sought details on troubled solar company

* Treasury questioned legality of loan restructuring

* Official complained was not given a say on the deal

* Energy Dept: decision was legal

By Roberta Rampton

WASHINGTON, Oct 7 (Reuters) - A top U.S. Treasury Department official complained the Energy Department kept Treasury in the dark about the precarious financial situation of Solyndra, a failed solar panel maker that had received government backing.

Mary Miller, Treasury's assistant secretary for financial markets, emailed the White House budget director in August with her concerns only two weeks before Solyndra filed for bankruptcy and was raided by the FBI, according to excerpts released on Friday by Republicans investigating the failed company.

The investigation into Solyndra has become a political headache for the Obama administration, which has staunchly defended decisions made on the $535 million loan guarantee under a program designed to spur clean energy technology.

When the company ran out of cash, the Energy Department agreed in February to a plan to restructure its debt. In that restructuring, some $75 million in private investment was ranked ahead of the government in the event of bankruptcy. That private fund was backed by a prominent Obama fundraiser.

The loan was provided by Treasury's Federal Financing Bank and was guaranteed and monitored by the Energy Department.

Treasury Department lawyers did not think the law allowed for the government loan to be subordinated, Miller said in an Aug. 17 email to Jeffrey Zients, deputy director of the White House Office of Management and Budget.

"In February, we requested in writing that DOE seek the Department of Justice's approval of any proposed restructuring. To our knowledge, that has never happened,'" Miller said in the email.

She also complained that "DOE has not responded to any requests for information about Solyndra" despite requests dating to July 2010, leaving Treasury to get its information solely from the OMB.

But emails provided by the administration showed that top staff at the Energy Department discussed the concerns with the chief financial officer of Treasury's Federal Financing Bank.

"Ultimately, DOE's determination that the restructuring was legal was made by career lawyers in the loan program based on a careful analysis of the statute," an Energy Department spokesman said.

A Treasury spokesman declined to elaborate on the contents of Miller's email.

The House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee has now requested Treasury turn over all documents related to the Solyndra loan guarantee.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
pdxuser wrote:
Ah, campaign season. A money-making investment in green energy (the plant is worth a lot more than our investment and will be sold at a profit) is contrived as a “scandal”, because we all know startups never fail unless there’s an evil Democratic conspiracy behind it.

Oct 08, 2011 1:13am EDT  --  Report as abuse
jugdish99 wrote:
pdvuser…what the heck are you saying? “the plant will be sold for more” 1100 people got laid off and they declared bankruptcy after taking nealy $500 MILLION in taxpayer funds! where’d the money go in LESS than a year? bottom line is, this was a political payback from Obama to some friends! sigh…but ever criticize the leader of the cult, OR ELSE? Liberals: generous people, with other peoples money! Raise taxes on rich, we don’t pay them anyways (Geitner, Rangle, Edwards, etc etc – lots of other leading dems caught for ‘tax mistakes’)

Oct 08, 2011 7:25am EDT  --  Report as abuse
turbovega wrote:
My understanding of how the Manhattan Project got funded was to hide the funding in it inside many, many bills. If it had been known to the penny-pinching GOP of that time, it would have been shot down as a waste of money .. which was why FDR engaged in the secrecy and trickery he did to get it through. The belly-aching over half-a-billion dollars to fund what seemed like a breakthrough technology doesn’t seem like much in a $3 trillion budget especially when you consider how much has been spent on Iraq and Afghanistan, which if we “ever” get any really value from will have cost too much. The Chinese sure know what they are about subsidizing their solar panel industry. Too bad we aren’t as smart, eh? The PRC isn’t saddled by silly politics but is busily pursuing its naked self interest .. the way the good old US of A used to do.

Oct 08, 2011 9:09am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.