Presidential race loses fizz for Tea Party

WASHINGTON/CHICAGO Sun Oct 9, 2011 7:21am EDT

1 of 2. A man carries a U.S. flag during a Tea Party rally in Napa, California, August 27, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Robert Galbraith

Related Topics

WASHINGTON/CHICAGO (Reuters) - With their favored candidates for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination lagging or out of the race, many U.S. Tea Party activists are shifting focus to the struggle for control of the U.S. Senate.

The fizz has gone out of the presidential contest for some supporters of the fiscally conservative movement now that former Alaska governor Sarah Palin is not running and Texas Governor Rick Perry and congresswoman Michele Bachmann are slipping in polls.

"No one is going to get perfect in a general election candidate. That is why we think the Senate is a better place to focus," said Matt Kibbe, president and chief executive of the libertarian FreedomWorks, a Tea Party group.

In the 2010 mid-term elections, Tea Party opposition to President Barack Obama's policies played a big role in slashing the Democrats' majority in the 100-member Senate to just six seats and eliminating their majority in the House of Representatives.

With 23 of the 33 Senate seats up for grabs next year now held by Democrats, and a wave of public hostility to incumbents, Tea Party activists said they looked forward to more Republican gains in 2012.

"We'll maintain the House without a problem. We absolutely have to take back the Senate and focus on that and not let presidential politics consume all of our time and energy," said Amy Kremer, chairwoman of the California-based Tea Party Express Political Action Committee.

Some of the eight to 10 Senate seats seen as very competitive next year are in Wisconsin, Florida and Ohio, states where Tea Party groups had a big impact in 2010 and during state legislative sessions, fueling optimism about next year, Kibbe said.

"If the issues are the economy and jobs, the burden of spending and the national debt, those are swing issues that Tea Partiers care about most -- there is a nice confluence in what motivates independent voters and what motivates Tea Partiers," he said.


Fueling the Tea Party's disenchantment with the Republican presidential race are suspicions that front-runner Mitt Romney is too moderate and not committed to core conservative causes. The Tea Party favors lower spending and smaller government.

The former Massachusetts governor has been attacked by conservatives for introducing a healthcare program in the state that many say was a model for the sweeping healthcare overhaul enacted by Obama in 2010.

"People are definitely not rallying to Romney," said Chris Littleton, co-founder of the Ohio Liberty Council, a coalition of about 80 Tea Party groups in Ohio, a swing state considered a must-win for any Republican presidential candidate.

"I cannot recall a single conversation I've had with anyone who is conservative and liberty-minded where that person supports Romney," he said.

Some are shifting allegiance to Herman Cain, who has gained in recent polls and appeals to Tea Party activists with a plan to drastically overhaul the tax code, but Cain has yet to prove he can assemble the strong campaign team or attract the level of donations he would need to secure the nomination.

Romney's campaign said his platform of reduced taxes, lower spending and limited government would appeal to Republicans, the Tea Party and even some Democrats, and that he would continue to reach out to all voters.

In the end, Tea Party voters are expected to put aside ideological differences with Romney if he does become the nominee, because their primary goal in next year's presidential race is denying Obama a second term.

"The Tea Party to some extent, though not completely, was born in reaction to the Obama movement. Certainly their number one priority is going to be to beat Barack Obama in the fall. There's no question about that," said Doug Heye, a political consultant and former Republican National Committee spokesman.

Sal Russo, chief strategist and co-founder of the Tea Party Express, said he viewed all the Republican candidates as fiscally conservative enough for the Tea Party. Besides, he added, in the end the movement's supporters want a candidate who can win.

"It certainly doesn't do us any good to run and lose," he said.

(Editing by Paul Simao)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (77)
TexanForever wrote:
Just when are these TPer’s going to come out and admit they are some of the most bigoted, racist individuals in America today? To a lot of us independents out here, their comments and actions strike a similar chord to a group that was active after the Civil War.

Oct 09, 2011 7:57am EDT  --  Report as abuse
jrlott wrote:
Patricia, you are either confused, ignorant, or you are trying to weaken the Tea Party for yours or someone elses personal or political gain. I hope you don’t consider yourself a journalist because this piece shouldn’t be classified as anything other than propaganda. The Tea Party cannot get weaker. It is a belief within people that cannot compromised. Individual liberty, smaller government. People don’t go away from that, more people get added to it. The overwhelming majority of Tea Partiers like Herman Cain or Ron Paul. And judging by Cain’s recent surge anyone with integrity can only conclude that the Tea Party is stronger than ever.

Oct 09, 2011 8:13am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Shoehanger wrote:
This story is BS. Herman Cain is more Tea Party than Perry and Bachmann. And this is directed at TexanForever: stop believing in what your media favorites are telling you. The Tea Party is not racist. How can I as a Tea Party member be racist when I want the GOP ticket to be Herman Cain and Mark Rubio? There is racism in every party, but it is not the party, the INDIVIDUALS are racist.

Oct 09, 2011 8:18am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.