UPDATE 1-Foreign profit tax break in '04 called costly flop

Tue Oct 11, 2011 4:52pm EDT

Related Topics

* Top Senate Democrats urge rejection of tax "holiday"

* Corporate lobbyists pour on pressure for tax break

* Only chance may be as part of bigger, broader bill

* Most studies show '04-'05 break did not boost jobs

By Kevin Drawbaugh

WASHINGTON, Oct 11 (Reuters) - Congress should reject another big tax break for overseas corporate profits because the last one in 2004-2005 was a costly failure, U.S. congressional investigators said in a report that immediately drew fire on Tuesday from an army of business lobbyists.

The Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations' report found that the repatriation tax holiday six years ago cost the U.S. Treasury $3.3 billion in lost revenue and "produced no appreciable increase in U.S. jobs or domestic investment."

A second such tax break, it said, would also cut government revenues, fail to create jobs and increase incentives for U.S. corporations to move more jobs and investment abroad.

At issue is an estimated $1.5 trillion in profits stashed abroad avoiding corporate taxes. In a statement, the panel's chairman urged lawmakers to refuse another tax give-away.

"We can't afford a tax break that would deepen the deficit, disadvantage domestic firms, and push more corporate dollars offshore, while failing to stimulate the economy," said the chairman, Democratic Senator Carl Levin.

Supporters of the tax break attacked Levin's report, with the Information Technology Industry Council, a lobbying group for Silicon Valley, saying the report was "stuck in the past" and "flies in the face of today's economic reality."

The fight comes as Congress and the Obama administration grapple with a sky-high budget deficit, an outdated U.S. tax code riddled with loopholes, and a sluggish economy.

With the government short on stimulus options, proponents of another overseas corporate income repatriation tax "holiday" are framing it as a way to boost the economy and hiring.

"A repatriation holiday could deploy money, as much as $1 trillion, into the economy," said Bruce Jostens, a senior executive at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the nation's largest lobbying group for large corporations.

That money could be deployed into the economy without a tax break, of course. However, corporations do not want to bring it into the country because then they would have to pay the full 35 percent corporate income tax rate on it. So, sensing that the time is right for a win, they are seeking a tax break.

BIG 'ASK' BY PHARMA, TECH

"Repatriation is one of the major 'asks' by big pharma and big tech, and is an important bargaining lever in the larger game of comprehensive corporate tax reform," said MF Global policy analyst Chris Krueger.

Legislation that would allow the repatriation tax break -- estimated to come at a cost to taxpayers of nearly $80 billion over 10 years -- was offered last week in the Senate. A similar bill emerged months ago in the House of Representatives.

Backed by a multimillion-dollar lobbying campaign, this legislation has some bipartisan support on Capitol Hill, but analysts do not expect it to be approved on its own. Rather, it could be tacked onto broader tax reform and spending bills.

Representative Sander Levin, the top Democrat on the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee, told reporters on Tuesday that he and Republican committee Chairman Dave Camp agree repatriation should be discussed as part of tax reform.

"That's been his position; it's been mine," said Levin, who is the brother of Senator Carl Levin. "I am in favor of looking at all of these issues as part of corporate tax reform."

The Obama administration takes the same position.

Numerous studies similar to the one released by Senator Carl Levin's subcommittee have said employment and investment gains would not likely result from a repatriation holiday.

Senator Levin was joined by Democratic Senator Kent Conrad in writing to Congress' deficit-reduction "super committee," urging members to refuse lobbyists' pleas.

"I'm hoping the facts can break through the lobbying frenzy over yet another corporate tax give-away that makes no sense and would damage our economic recovery," Levin said.

In 2004-2005, under a Bush administration program, 843 U.S. multinational corporations brought home $362 billion in overseas income at a 5.25 percent tax. Most of it went to stock buybacks and dividend increases, studies said.

Goldman Sachs analyst Alec Phillips said last week that another repatriation holiday "would most likely increase dividend payments and share buybacks ... we would not expect a significant change in corporate hiring or investment plans."

He added that the issue will "receive additional attention over the next several weeks. However, we are skeptical that another repatriation tax holiday will become law this year."

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
BradReeseCom wrote:
Hi Kevin,

According the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations about the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (AJCA):

“Cisco informed the Subcommittee that, after claiming a $1.2 billion dividend received deduction under the AJCA in 2006, it later amended its 2006 tax return and no longer took the $1.2 billion deduction. Cisco told the Subcommittee that this action was the result of a larger settlement with the IRS of issues related to a 2002-2004 audit, which resulted in Cisco recharacterizing the $1.2 billion as previously taxed and therefore not subject to any additional tax. According to Cisco, since the funds were considered previously taxed, they were no longer considered a dividend.”

I mean, the Senate report implies that Cisco paid absolutely NO tax whatsoever on the $1.2 billion in cash it repatriated from overseas under the provisions of the 2004 foreign profits tax holiday (i.e. AJCA – American Jobs Creation Act of 2004).

Cisco backed foreign profits tax holiday lobbying powerhouse, WIN America, publicized the following misinformation that’s clearly NOT accurate:

“Cisco used repatriated funds to create 1,200 R&D (mostly engineering) jobs. Since the 2004 law went into effect, Cisco has added 8,500 jobs in the United States.”

However, Cisco’s yearly Form 10-K’s filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission contain the accurate facts:

From the end of Cisco FY05 until the end of Cisco FY11, only 9,887 new Cisco jobs were created in the United States (scandalously in my opinion, Cisco won’t reveal how many of its new 9,887 U.S. based jobs were actually filled by U.S. Citizens).

However simultaneously and most tellingly, from the end of Cisco FY05 until the end of Cisco FY11, Cisco created 23,525 new jobs in locations outside the United States.

That’s right, after receiving a $1.2 billion foreign profits repatriation tax holiday in 2004, Cisco created 237% more new jobs in locations outside of the United States than it did in the U.S.

Sincerely,

Brad Reese

Oct 12, 2011 6:06am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.