I can create 1.2 million energy jobs: Perry

WEST MIFFLIN, Pennsylvania Fri Oct 14, 2011 12:55pm EDT

Republican presidential candidate Governor Rick Perry (R-TX) takes the stage to address the Family Research Council's Values Voters Summit in Washington October 7, 2011.  REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

Republican presidential candidate Governor Rick Perry (R-TX) takes the stage to address the Family Research Council's Values Voters Summit in Washington October 7, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Jonathan Ernst

WEST MIFFLIN, Pennsylvania (Reuters) - Republican presidential candidate Rick Perry outlined plans on Friday to dramatically increase energy production and create 1.2 million jobs, taking aim at federal regulations he said are strangling the economy.

Perry's announcement at a U.S. Steel plant in a suburb near Pittsburgh came as the Texas governor seeks to shore up his campaign for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination after a series of shaky debate performances and distractions knocked him out of the front-runner position.

Perry said if elected in November 2012 he would sign a series of executive orders in the first 100 days of his administration to roll back federal regulations and open up more areas for oil and gas exploration.

"We are standing atop the next American economic boom -- energy," Perry said. "The quickest way to give our economy a shot in the arm is to deploy American ingenuity to tap American energy. But we can only do that if environmental bureaucrats are told to stand down."

Perry would repeal the Environmental Protection Agency's authority over greenhouse gases blamed for global warming and eliminate all current and planned EPA programs to restrict carbon dioxide emissions. Many Republicans in Congress would support that but it would be hard to overturn the Supreme Court's ruling in 2007 the EPA has the authority to regulate those gases.

Perry sprinkled his remarks with a harsh denunciation of Democratic President Barack Obama, who he said is responsible for "activist regulations" that have made it more difficult to extract energy resources. Obama has favored green technologies that are not producing as many jobs as promised, he said.

"His energy policies are driven by the concerns of activists in his party, my policies are driven by the concerns of American workers without jobs," Perry said.

The Obama re-election campaign reacted quickly.

"Governor Perry's energy policy isn't the way to win the future, it's straight out of the past - doubling down on finite resources with no plan to promote innovation or to transition the nation to a clean energy economy," said campaign spokesman Ben LaBolt.

It was the first of two speeches Perry is delivering to outline proposals to bring down the 9.1 percent U.S. unemployment rate, the main issue in the 2012 campaign. His second speech, expected around October 25, is to focus on tax reform, reducing the U.S. debt burden and reforming entitlement programs.

Perry has fallen behind former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney and businessman Herman Cain in polls of Republican voters.

However, he has strong backing from many conservatives and raised $17 million in the third quarter of this year, more than Romney's $14 million. This will ensure a well-funded campaign to wage battles in the early voting states of Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina.


Perry would open up several American oil and gas fields for exploration that are currently off limits, including parts of the Gulf of Mexico, Alaska and the mid-Atlantic.

Obama has announced plans to expand oil output in the Gulf of Mexico and Alaska. But so far the most progress he has made in the problem of U.S. foreign oil dependency has been in issuing tougher standards on vehicle fuel efficiency.

Perry said he would open for energy production Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, long a battleground between environmentalists and energy companies, and said doing so could create 120,000 jobs.

He also promised to start off-shore exploration in the Beaufort and Chukchi seas off the northern and western coasts of Alaska, saying it would create 55,000 jobs.

Construction of the Keystone XL pipeline to carry Canadian crude to coastal refineries, would create 20,000 American jobs, Perry said. The pipeline is caught up in U.S. red tape and opposed by many on various environmental grounds. The U.S. State Department has said the pipeline would add only about 7,000 jobs.

Perry pledged to tap the full potential of the Marcellus Shale natural gas field in Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Ohio. He would open up federal and private lands for exploration in states like Wyoming, Montana, New Mexico, North Dakota, Colorado and Utah.

(Additional reporting by Timothy Gardner in Washington, Editing by Jackie Frank)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
Nullcorp wrote:
What do mountaintop removal coal mining, cross-continental pipelines, and hydrofracking have in common, besides being at the top of every Republican energy agenda? They are lethal to the people who live nearby. I personally know people in West Virginia who can’t drink their tap water because it’s contaminated with heavy metals. The pipeline rupture near Yellowstone earlier this year spread 40,000+ gallons of crude oil across a 100-mile section of the Yellowstone River. The harsh light of reality was shone on the hydrofracking industry in the recent documentary, Gasland, which showed that the water coming out of residential sinks near fracking sites can actually be set on fire.

The “environmental bureaucrats” are not obstacles to a thriving economy. The Environmental Protection Agency is also there to protect the American people from the toxic byproducts of industry. The Republican energy agenda shows a lack of creativity (it hasn’t changed in the past six decades despite advances in renewable tech), a lack or foresight (crude oil, shale, and tar sands WILL eventually become depleted, unlike the forces of sun, wind, and water), and a lack of concern for the health of the individuals unlucky enough to get poisoned – literally, poisoned by arsenic, benzene, and worse – by the industries that the Republicans support.

If you vote for this guy, you’re literally poisoning your fellow citizens. You’re literally allowing them to be sickened and killed by heavy industry and a federal government that does nothing to protect its citizens from the modern-day robber barons: the owners of the coal, oil, and gas industries.

Oct 18, 2011 12:29pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.


California's historic drought

With reservoirs at record lows, California is in the midst of the worst drought in decades.  Slideshow