Scarce resources, climate biggest threats to world health

Related Topics

An environmental activist watches a lumberjack saw a tree in Sumava National Park near the village of Modrava July 27, 2011. REUTERS/Petr Josek

An environmental activist watches a lumberjack saw a tree in Sumava National Park near the village of Modrava July 27, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Petr Josek

LONDON | Mon Oct 17, 2011 2:47pm EDT

LONDON (Reuters) - The Earth's natural resources like food, water and forests are being depleted at an alarming speed, causing hunger, conflict, social unrest and species extinction, experts at a climate and health conference in London warned Monday.

Increased hunger due to food yield changes will lead to malnutrition; water scarcity will deteriorate hygiene; pollution will weaken immune systems; and displacement and social disorder due to conflicts over water and land will increase the spread of infectious diseases, they said.

By 2050, there could be 70 million additional deaths in sub-Saharan Africa alone, said Tony McMichael, professor of population health at the Australian National University.

As mosquito species spread due to climate change, the transmission rate of diseases like malaria will increase, engulfing countries like Zimbabwe from 2025 to 2050.

An extra 21 million people in China could be at risk from the infectious disease schistosomiasis as global warming increases floods, enabling disease-carrying water snails to travel to new areas.

"Climate change will progressively weaken the Earth's life support mechanism," McMichael said. "Health is not just collateral damage on the side, the risk is central and represents a denouement of all the other effects of climate change."

The world's population is due to exceed 7 billion this month and is forecast to rise to over 10 billion by 2050, putting even more strain on global resources.

The effects of climate change will only exacerbate the problems, putting the health of ecosystems, animal species and humans in danger, the experts said.

EUROPE

Health effects will not just be felt in Africa or Asia -- Europe will also feel the consequences.

"The problem of over-consumption in high income countries has produced an ecological and financial debt," Ian Roberts, professor at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, told Reuters.

"The biggest risk to human health is from the rise in fossil fuel use, causing cardiovascular disease, stroke and cancer," he added.

Europe will also be at risk from heat waves, floods and more infectious diseases as pests shift to northern latitudes, said Sari Kovats, lead author of the Europe chapter for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's (IPCC) fifth assessment report.

"The fact is, there is more evidence that diseases are moving north such as bluetongue," she told Reuters.

The IPCC's next report, which is due out in 2013-2014, will include chapters on human security and livelihoods and poverty for the first time to reflect the new raft of scientific evidence, she added.

Human health is not only at risk. Animal and plant species are also endangered.

"Many species are already facing a raft of pressures and climate change is creating a new range of additional problems," said Paul Pearce-Kelly, senior curator at London's Zoological Society.

Around 15 to 37 percent of over 6,000 species of amphibia are predicted to become extinct by 2100, he said.

In the Earth's history, there have been five mass extinctions, but there is now a 10,000-fold faster extinction rate than at any time on record.

"We are losing three species an hour, and this is before climate change is doing anything," said Hugh Montgomery, director at University College London's institute for human health and performance.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (10)
happyuk wrote:
Each time an alarmist line of ducks is shot down, up they pop again with exactly the same drivel. Oddly, I never seem to see any unequivocal evidence to support the assertions made by the likes of McMichael.

I suppose the raison d’etre is that if you say the same things for long enough, some of it will stick. They don’t appear to have reckoned with the public not swallowing global warming (?) hook, line and sinker any more.

There are several global climate models, half a dozen from the USA, some from the UK Met Office, one from Australia, etc. Much used to be made of the fact that these models “agreed” with each other.

Prior to the UEA scam all climate models predicted warmer temperatures than were actually happening. Doh! That means the models were/are wrong, or biased, or both, meaning that we should take the likes of Prof McMichael far less seriously than is supposed.

Global warming is a blatantly unscientific religion. It has what all religions have which is faith, because no one can prove their religion. It has a Garden of Eden element, destruction brought by humanity then redemption for our sins by paying higher taxes and getting rid of our cars and planes. Except for the warmists of course.

Oct 17, 2011 3:07pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Franckophile wrote:
Yawn… heard it all before.

Trouble is, the world ISN’T warming, CO2 levels are mounting, which does plants a great deal of good, if we weren’t growing biofuels there’d be more food grown… How much more of this useless twaddle do we have to put up with?

Oct 17, 2011 3:41pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Eideard wrote:
You lot make the average ostrich appear open-minded. Har.

Oct 17, 2011 4:25pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.