Pennsylvania Senate OKs state takeover of Harrisburg

Tue Oct 18, 2011 6:01pm EDT

City of Harrisburg Mayor Linda Thompson speaks about her city's bankruptcy filing at a news conference at Harrisburg City Hall in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, October 12, 2011.  REUTERS/Daniel Shanken

City of Harrisburg Mayor Linda Thompson speaks about her city's bankruptcy filing at a news conference at Harrisburg City Hall in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, October 12, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Daniel Shanken

Related Topics

(Reuters) - The Pennsylvania state Senate on Tuesday voted for a state takeover of the finances of its capital, Harrisburg, setting up a showdown with the city, which filed for bankruptcy last week.

The plan was already approved by the state's lower house and is expected to be signed into law by Governor Tom Corbett.

Corbett has said the city would have been better off if it agreed to a rescue plan under the state's Act 47 program for distressed cities -- which has seen Philadelphia and other cities through crises. His office stressed its opposition to the bankruptcy.

"This ongoing, reckless behavior has become a national embarrassment, not only for this city but for our entire Commonwealth, as Harrisburg is the only municipality in state history to reject an Act 47 recovery plan," said State Senator Jeff Piccola, who helped write the bill.

"The bankruptcy filing recently approved by City Council is illegal and demonstrates the majority's inability and absolute flagrant disregard in governing the city in a responsible manner," Piccola said. "Their behavior has brought us to this point, which is unfortunate but necessary."

The City Council's special lawyer said the state's actions will not supersede the council's action, however.

The Senate's action is "after the fact," said Philadelphia attorney Mark Schwartz, who is representing the council. "The bankruptcy court has jurisdiction over this, and that's the end of the story."

The bill empowers Corbett to declare a state of fiscal emergency in Harrisburg and petition for the appointment of a receiver. The receiver would be charged with drafting and implementing a long-term recovery plan.

Slate Dabney, a commercial bankruptcy attorney and partner in the New York law office of King & Spalding, said he believes the bankruptcy will ultimately be dismissed.

"Once it's dismissed, then with this new law, the governor may very well decide to go ahead with a receiver, given the political stalemate in Harrisburg," said Dabney, who is not involved in the Harrisburg case.

MAYOR AGAINST BANKRUPTCY

On Monday, a U.S. bankruptcy judge declined to rule immediately on the legality of Harrisburg's Chapter 9 municipal bankruptcy filing and set a hearing date for November 23.

The city of 50,000 is struggling with debt approaching $400 million, including about $300 million incurred from an expensive revamp of its incinerator. The incinerator is owned by the Harrisburg Authority, a separate municipal entity, but the city and Dauphin County guarantee much of that debt.

In a bid to resolve the crisis, the Harrisburg City Council last week voted 4-3 to file for bankruptcy.

Harrisburg Mayor Linda Thompson, who opposed the move, filed a petition to have the filing dismissed, claiming it was illegal because the City Council did not follow proper procedure. The state joined Thompson, the county and bondholders in opposing the filing.

In July, the City Council rejected a state-approved rescue plan, which called on Harrisburg to renegotiate labor deals, cut jobs, and sell or lease the city's major assets -- its parking garages and the incinerator. In August, the Council rejected a similar plan put forward by the mayor.

Thompson, in a statement on Tuesday, called the state's actions "regrettable and ... totally avoidable" and faulted the Council for rejecting the recovery plans.

"I did not support this bill, but I will work diligently with all parties involved in the recovery process moving forward," she said.

Dabney said the bill may be relevant to what the bankruptcy judge decides. "It was not in effect at the time that the bankruptcy, or the purported bankruptcy, was filed, which was last week," Dabney said.

Schwartz heaped blamed upon the governor.

"It's too little. It's too late," Schwartz said. "It shows a clear failure of the governor not having a local tax reform plan ... If he were serious about helping these municipalities avert bankruptcy, he would have a local tax plan."

(Reporting by Edith Honan and Jim Christie in San Francisco; Additional reporting by Chip Barnett in New York, and Tom Hals in Wilmington, Delaware; Editing by Andrew Hay and Jan Paschal)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
jbad1 wrote:
Many cities across the nation should follow Harrisburg’s lead. Cities in Illinois, California and Rhode Island should follow but instead the legislatures will hammer the citizens of those states w increased taxes and fees to foot the bill of phoney baloney pensions for the liars and thieves who long ago figured how to play the system to their advantage. Actually the liars and thieves s/b taken to court and exposed for what they are, their families s/b ruined.

Oct 18, 2011 5:03pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
edgyinchina wrote:
The ultimate question for Tea Party folks (and Republicans as a whole)…. If States can disregard what the Federal Government says and do what they want, can cities do this same thing to the State????

Oct 18, 2011 8:01pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
fsck100 wrote:
From a lifetime PA resident: so replacing incompetent local elected officials with a mix of incompetent and malevolent state officials will accomplish what? Oh, of course, higher taxes for Harrisburg residents, massive cuts in services and a bailout of debt holders. I find it interesting that no media coverage of this reports the actual, structural cause of Harrisburg’s insolvency: much of the prime real estate in the city is state land with state office buildings on it. The state does not pay Harrisburg property taxes. And the legislature absolutely refuses to enact a meaningful payment-in-lieu-of-taxes program for the capital city. Yes the incinerator fiasco is a major problem. But it is being used as a smokescreen to hide the fundamental fiscal problem. Which the state legislature is solely responsible for. As a former appointed official quipped during the 2010 state budget battle, referring to the legislature: “There’s no adult supervision.”

Oct 18, 2011 8:22pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Recommended Newsletters

Reuters U.S. Top News
A quick-fix on the day's news published with Reuters videos and award-winning news photography and delivered at your choice of one of four times during the day.
Reuters Deals Today
The latest Reuters articles on M&A, IPOs, private equity, hedge funds and regulatory updates delivered to your inbox each day.
Reuters Technology Report
Your daily briefing on the latest tech developments from around the world from Reuters expert tech correspondents.